Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1211–1224. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0435-9

Table 3.

Results of mixed effects models.

Recognition of studied items
Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3 Experiment 4

Variable β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p

Intercept 1.29 0.18 7.1 < .001 .557 .184 3.0 .002 1.34 .255 5.2 < .001 −.734 .368 −2.0 .05
Condition
(yoked study)
−.512 .068 −7.5 < .001 −.342 .071 −4.8 < .001 −.367 .071 −5.2 < .001 −.343 .070 −5.0 < .001
Number of
visits
.068 .022 3.1 .002 .473 .040 11.8 < .001 .238 .080 2.9 .003 1.19 .167 7.1 < .001
Reversed
serial position
−.009 .002 −4.1 < .001 0. .002 −.04 .97 −.015 .004 −3.9 < .001 0. .003 .16 .87
Block index −.144 .021 −7.0 < .001 −.182 .021 −8.5 < .001 −.164 .024 −6.8 < .001 −.223 .021 −10.8 < .001

Spatial recall – Placement error
Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3 Experiment 4

Variable β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p β SE Wald z p

Intercept 1.29 .080 16.1 < .001 1.39 .117 11.9 < .001 1.11 .106 10.5 < .001 1.57 .263 6.0 < .001
Condition
(yoked study)
.144 .040 3.6 < .001 .053 .058 .90 .37 .103 .039 2.6 < .01 .040 .040 1.0 .30
Number of
visits
−.040 .013 −3.0 .003 −.009 .032 −.27 .78 .002 .046 .05 .95 −.154 .129 −1.2 .24
Reversed
serial position
.001 .001 1.1 .27 −.001 .002 −.28 .78 .012 .002 5.4 < .001 .002 .002 1.4 .16
Block index .008 .012 .65 .52 −.006 .017 −.36 .72 −.014 .013 −1.1 .29 −.027 .011 −2.3 .02