Table 3. Evaluation of DIAGNOdent in secondary carie in permanent teeth .
| First author’s Name/year | In vitro\ In vivo | Sample volume | Occlusal/ Proximal | Comparison of Methods | Gold Standard | Results | Conclusion | |
| 1 | K. W. Neuhaus 201233 | In vitro | 75 Human molars | Proximal |
1. DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Radiography BW |
Histology | Results showed that use of LF in comparison with BW for proximal in the cervical region of margins of amalgam restorations led to better detection of secondary caries which had not extended to CEJ | +* |
| 2 | Kositbowornchai S 201240 | In vitro | 100 Human molars | Occlusal |
. 1.DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Radiography Digital |
Histology | Use of Diagnodent in comparison to digital radiography in the diagnosis of caries under posterior composite restorations had no significant difference | =** |
| 3 | Rodrigues JA 201041 | In vitro | 43 Human molars (60 regions) | Proximal |
1. Visual method (VE) 2. Radiography (BW) 3. Visual method and radiography (VEBW) 4. DIAGNOdent (Pen) |
Histology and hardness measuring | DIAGNOdent has to be considered as a complementary method in the diagnosis of secondary proximal caries in relation to composite restorations | = |
| 4 | Bamzahim M 200542 | In vivo | 51 Human premolars and molars | Occlusal and Proximal |
1. DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Radiography BW 3. Visual method |
Visual and Tactile | Results of this study showed that treatment decision shouldn’t be made of the basis of DIAGNOdent findings alone. Even if this device could be used as a valuable complementary tool for usual methods in the diagnosis of secondary caries of teeth restored with amalgam. | = |
| 5 | Ando M 200410 | In vitro | 50 Human premolar and molars | Occlusal and Proximal |
1. DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Visual method |
CLSM (confocal laser scanning microscopy | Results obtained from this study suggest that LF and QLF could improve the ability to diagnose secondary caries around amalgam restorations | + |
| 6 |
Bamzahim M 200412 |
In vitro | 66 Teeth | Occlusal |
1. DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Radiography Digital (BW) |
Histology | Results showed that DIAGNOdent could be a beneficial tool in the detection of secondary caries | = |
| 7 |
Boston DW 200343 |
In vitro |
15 Teeth (30 regions) |
- |
1. DIAGNOdent (LF) 2. Visual method |
Histology | DIAGNOdent is better than visual method in the diagnosis of secondary caries of dentin compared to visual method, but with no significant difference | = |
* Meaning of + is that DIAGNOdent has a better results compared to other methods for diagnosis of caries
** Meaning of = is that DIAGNOdent has no significant difference in comparison to other methods for detection of caries