Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 29;85(5):1995–2010. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12253

Table 5.

Results of the Binary Logistic Regression Analyses on Adaptive Choice Switching From Experiments Experiment 2a and Experiment 2b

95% CI for Exp b
B (SE) Lower Exp b Upper
Experiment 2a
 Regret on Day 1 1.60* (0.52) 1.78 4.96 13.87
 Age in months 0.03 (0.04) 0.96 1.03 1.12
 Constant −3.33 (3.25) 0.04
Experiment 3
 Regret on Day 1 1.12* (0.42) 1.36 3.08 6.96
 Age in months −0.02 (0.03) 0.92 0.98 1.04
 Raw BPVS scores 0.01 (0.02) 0.98 1.01 1.04
 Constant 0.59 (2.47) 1.8

Note. For Experiment 2a, R2 = .12 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .14 (Cox & Snell), .19 (Nagelkerke); model χ2(2) = 10.48, p < .006. For Experiment 2b, R2 = .12 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .14 (Cox & Snell), .19 (Nagelkerke); model χ2(2) = 10.48, p < .006. BPVS = British Picture Vocabulary Scale.

*

p < .003.