Table 5.
Results of the Binary Logistic Regression Analyses on Adaptive Choice Switching From Experiments Experiment 2a and Experiment 2b
| 95% CI for Exp b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | Lower | Exp b | Upper | |
| Experiment 2a | ||||
| Regret on Day 1 | 1.60* (0.52) | 1.78 | 4.96 | 13.87 |
| Age in months | 0.03 (0.04) | 0.96 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Constant | −3.33 (3.25) | 0.04 | ||
| Experiment 3 | ||||
| Regret on Day 1 | 1.12* (0.42) | 1.36 | 3.08 | 6.96 |
| Age in months | −0.02 (0.03) | 0.92 | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| Raw BPVS scores | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.04 |
| Constant | 0.59 (2.47) | 1.8 | ||
Note. For Experiment 2a, R2 = .12 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .14 (Cox & Snell), .19 (Nagelkerke); model χ2(2) = 10.48, p < .006. For Experiment 2b, R2 = .12 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .14 (Cox & Snell), .19 (Nagelkerke); model χ2(2) = 10.48, p < .006. BPVS = British Picture Vocabulary Scale.
p < .003.