Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 20;42(4):333–340. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12090

Table 3.

Changes observed in the mean surface hardness scores in the individual study centers

Cologne Leipzig Geneva
Test group Control group Intergroup comparisona Test group Control group Intergroup comparisona Test group Control group Intergroup comparisona
Observation time
 T0 3.5 ± 0.51 3.5 ± 0.51 = 0.8987 3.5 ± 0.50 3.5 ± 0.59 = 0.8486 3.1 ± 0.75 3.2 ± 0.89 = 0.7695
 T1 2.8 ± 0.56 3.7 ± 0.60 = 0.0764 3.3 ± 0.58 3.2 ± 0.69 = 0.4447 2.8 ± 0.80 3.1 ± 1.02 = 0.3211
 T2 2.0 ± 0.57 2.7 ± 0.67 < 0.0001 3.0 ± 0.57 2.7 ± 0.65 = 0.2226 2.5 ± 0.91 3.0 ± 1.08 = 0.1610
Intragroup comparisona
 T0 versus T1 < 0.0001 = 0.0089 = 0.3693 = 0.1484 = 0.4212 = 0.9921
 T0 versus T2 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 = 0.0134 = 0.0010 = 0.0654 = 0.6816
 T1 versus T2 < 0.0001 = 0.0161 = 0.1031 = 0.0492 = 0.2886 = 0.6889

Test Group, High-fluoride toothpaste (5000 ppm F); Control Group, Regular-fluoride toothpaste (1350 ppm F); T0, Baseline; T1, 3 months; T2, 6 months.

a

Post hoc Bonferroni–Dunn correction for multiple comparisons, adjusted P-value for significance = 0.0167.