Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 23;45(2):191–197. doi: 10.1111/age.12123

Table 2.

Results from the genome-wide and bootstrap analysis.

Trait SSC Position (cM) F-ratio Estimate effect 95% CI (cM) (start–end) Significance level (P)
Additive effect (±SE) Dominance effect (±SE)
TBA 8 105 6.98 −0.03 (0.38) −2.12 (0.56) 0.0–133.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
18 49 6.02 −0.18 (0.46) −2.37 (0.68) 5.0–53.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
LS 6 102 5.65 1.38 (0.45) 0.92 (0.65) 7.0–102.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
8 105 5.86 −0.03 (0.43) −2.18 (0.63) 4.0–135.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
18 47 7.41 −0.36 (0.52) −2.95 (0.77) 6.0–53.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.01)
PS 8 124 7.53 −0.03 (0.02) −0.1 (0.03) 2.0–136.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
OR 7 56 7.45 −1.38 (0.45) 0.98 (0.58) 8.0–75.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
13 56 8.42 −1.51 (0.4) 0.84 (0.56) 27.0–97.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.01)
15 8 8.3 −1.82 (0.47) 1.06 (0.66) 2.0–60.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.01)
18 42 5.28 −1.064 (0.45) −1.59 (0.66) 1.0–52.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
TN 5 52 10.32 −0.63 (0.14) 0.12 (0.22) 17.5–69.0 Genome-wide (<0.05)
6 20 5.19 −0.75 (0.23) −0.33 (0.26) 0.0–97.0 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)
18 0 6.44 −0.55 (0.15) −0.17 (0.21) 0.0–50.5 Chromosome-wide (<0.05)

The table indicates the trait analysed (TBA, total born alive; LS, litter size; PS, prenatal survival; OR, ovulation rate; TN, teat number), chromosome (SSC) where a significant QTL was found, position of the QTL in cMs, F-ratio for the QTL, estimated additive and dominance effect (± standard error), confidence interval in cM and significant levels for each QTL.