Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.009

Table 5.

Multivariate models for CBE outcomes

Model 1,a OR (95% CI)
Model 2,b OR (95% CI)
Ever had a CBE CBE in the past 2 years Ever had a CBE CBE in the past 2 years
Intervention (ref=ME)
 LHWO+ME 2.94 (1.63, 5.30) 3.04 (2.11, 4.37) 2.63 (1.34, 5.16) 2.67 (1.78, 4.02)
Age (ref=50–64 years)
 40–49 years 0.99 (0.45, 2.15) 0.70 (0.45, 1.08) 1.07 (0.47, 2.45) 0.73 (0.46, 1.15)
 ≥ 65 years 1.08 (0.52, 2.26) 0.51 (0.31, 0.83) 1.21 (0.57, 2.57) 0.56 (0.34, 0.93)
Health insurance (ref=no)
 Yes 0.89 (0.41, 1.92) 1.31 (0.87, 2.00) 0.84 (0.36, 1.97) 1.25 (0.80, 1.92)
Knowledge score (each point) 0.95 (0.85, 1.07) 0.99 (0.93, 1.06)
Media exposure score (each point) 1.12 (0.87, 1.43) 1.05 (0.90, 1.21)

Note: Max re-scaled R2s are as follows: Model 1, receipt ever=0.61; Model 1, receipt within 2 years=0.36; Model 2, receipt ever=0.61; Model 2, receipt within 2 years=0.36.

a

Model 1 adjusted for baseline screening status, lay health worker agency, language proficiency, years in the U.S., education, employment, marital status, insurance, family history of breast cancer, and household clusters

b

Model 2 adjusted for all covariates in Model 1, plus changes in knowledge and media exposure scores

CBE, clinical breast examination; LHWO, lay health worker outreach; ME, media education