Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 13;67(12):1267–1282. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12322

Table 6.

Summary of changes from baseline in glucose-related FS-MMTT end-points and indices of β-cell function at week 26 (LOCF)*

PBO CANA 100 mg CANA 300 mg
Two-hour PPG, n 38 46 38
 Mean ± SD baseline (mmol/l) 15.5 ± 3.4 16.5 ± 3.7 16.0 ± 4.0
 LS mean ± SE change –1.1 ± 0.6 –2.6 ± 0.6 –3.1 ± 0.6
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) –1.5 (–3.0, –0.1) –2.1 (–3.6, –0.5)
AUCG(0–3 h), n 34 41 36
 Mean ± SD baseline (mmol/l·h) 41.4 ± 8.2 44.0 ± 9.3 43.3 ± 8.9
 LS mean ± SE change –4.3 ± 1.4 –6.3 ± 1.3 –9.2 ± 1.4
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) –2.0 (–5.5, 1.6) –4.9 (–8.5, –1.3)
ΔAUCG(0–3 h), n 34 41 36
 Mean ± SD baseline (mmol/l·h) 13.6 ± 4.5 14.5 ± 4.7 14.6 ± 4.8
 LS mean ± SE change –1.8 ± 0.8 –2.5 ± 0.8 –3.3 ± 0.8
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) –0.8 (–2.8, 1.2) –1.6 (–3.6, 0.5)
HOMA2-%B, n 129 133 133
 Mean ± SD baseline 55.4 ± 38.1 51.3 ± 32.3 53.0 ± 28.0
 LS mean ± SE change –1.0 ± 4.8 12.3 ± 4.9 25.9 ± 4.8
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) 13.3 (1.1, 25.5) 26.9 (14.7, 39.1)
AUCC(0–3 h), n 33 41 36
 Mean ± SD baseline (nmol/l·h) 4.9 ± 2.0 5.3 ± 2.4 4.9 ± 2.5
 LS mean ± SE change –0.4 ± 0.2 –0.1 ± 0.2 –0.3 ± 0.2
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) 0.3 (–0.2, 0.8) 0.1 (–0.4, 0.7)
AUCC/AUCG ratio, n 33 40 35
 Mean ± SD baseline (pmol/mmol) 123.1 ± 51.6 131.7 ± 79.8 122.5 ± 72.3
 LS mean ± SE change –3.4 ± 10.6 23.7 ± 10.5 24.0 ± 11.1
 Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) 27.1 (–0.2, 54.4) 27.4 (–0.7, 55.6)

FS-MMTT, frequently-sampled mixed-meal tolerance test; LOCF, last observation carried forward; PBO, placebo; CANA, canagliflozin; PPG, postprandial glucose; SD, standard deviation; LS, least squares; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; AUCG, glucose area under the curve; ΔAUCG, incremental glucose area under the curve; HOMA, Homeostasis Model Assessment; AUCC, C-peptide area under the curve.

*

Statistical comparison for CANA 100 and 300 mg vs. PBO not performed (not prespecified).

Assessed in patients who participated in the FS-MMTT.