Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 1;71(6):2105–2117. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24877

Table 3.

Signal Decay Parameters Estimated from the Averaged Simulated DW Images at Different Applied Noise Levels σapplied Using the MP, MD, and NR Algorithms (simulation 2)a

Metastatic tissue
DME Dfast DSE α DBE f D*BE
TRUE 1.31 3.49 0.98 0.45 0.59 0.33 17.48
SNR = 3
NR 0.91 2.54 0.38 0.39 0.33 0.38 6.58
MP 1.24 3.48 0.66 0.43 0.49 0.35 10.99
MD 1.37 3.49 0.60 0.42 0.42 0.37 10.68
SNR = 5
NR 1.18 3.23 0.8 0.43 0.44 0.37 10.13
MP 1.3 3.51 0.96 0.45 0.56 0.34 13.59
MD 1.29 3.51 0.96 0.45 0.55 0.34 13.73
SNR = 8
NR 1.26 3.47 0.93 0.46 0.51 0.35 14.35
MP 1.3 3.47 0.95 0.46 0.59 0.33 16.39
MD 1.28 3.47 0.96 0.48 0.57 0.34 15.83
a

The applied noise levels corresponding to SNR = 3, 5, and 8 of the b = 1000 s/mm2 DW image. The estimated decay parameters were compared with the ground truth decay parameters (true) derived from noise-free averaged DW images with the NR algorithm. Comparison includes the ROI corresponding to the metastatic tissue. Diffusion coefficients (abbreviations shown in Table1 are given in units of 10−3 mm2/s.