Table 3.
Organism | Method/dem model | –1 < Ns < 0 | –10 < Ns < 1 | –10 < Ns | Distribution(s) fitted | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Human | Diffusion + complex demography | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.43 | Mix of normal exponential/neutral | 57 |
Human | EWK2009 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.56 | Γ | 56 |
Mus musculus castaneus | K&K | 0.19 | 0 | 0.81 | LN, Γ, β, Spikes | 59 |
Pan troglodytes | EWK2009 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.74 | Γ | 76 |
D. melanogaster | EWK2009 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.87 | Γ | 56 |
Saccharomyces cerevisae | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | Γ | 63 | |
S. paradoxus | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | |||
Angiosperms | EWK2009 | 0.1–0.35 | 0.05–0.15 | 0.7–0.8 | Γ | 77 |
Medicago truncatula | EWK2009 | 20–35 | 12–15 | 50–65 | Γ | 78 |
EWK200956: diffusion based, simple demographic model fitted featuring a possible step change from population size N1 to population size N2 at some time t in the past (N1, N2, and t become “nuisance parameters” estimated alongside DFE and the fraction of favorable mutations).
K&K: discrete W–F matrix based, demographic model identical to EWK2009.
Dem, demographic; LN, log normal; spikes, spikes at different Ns class values.