Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 15;128(1):15–23. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2409-5

Table 4.

Evaluation of confirmed QTL for their contribution for resistance to SCN HG types 1.2.5.7 (PA2), 0 (PA3), 1.3.5.6.7 (PA14), and 1.2.3.4.5.6.7 (LY2)

Population Genotype Phenotype [FI % of SCN HG type (SCN isolate)] Number of RILs
Rhg1 QTL on Chr. 20 1.2.5.7 (PA2) 0 (PA3) 1.3.5.6.7 (PA14) 1.2.3.4.5.6.7 (LY2)
Pop1 104.0 ± 31.0 79.3 ± 14.0 85.5 ± 15.1 109.4 ± 26.6 13
+ 77.9 ± 27.3a 14.9 ± 6.9a 42.5 ± 20.5a 82.7 ± 21.9a 10
+ + 65.0 ± 26.4a 9.2 ± 4.5a,b 24.7 ± 19a,b 43.3 ± 18.4a,b 14
Pop2 86.3 ± 23.3 75.4 ± 13.3 63.2 ± 24.6 119.9 ± 26.8 12
+ 68.4 ± 15.9 10.7 ± 5.2a 21.6 ± 4.1a 78.7 ± 20.4a 9
+ + 52.3 ± 15.5a 8.3 ± 4.2a 11.6 ± 6.2a,b 49.7 ± 27.1a,b 7

Pop1 population of 119 F7 RILs developed from a Hutcheson × PI 437655 cross

Pop2 population of 192 F7 RILs developed from a Williams 82 × PI 437655 cross

− The allele from Hutcheson in Pop1 or the allele from Williams 82 in Pop2

+ The allele from PI 437655

a P < 0.05 by a Student’s t test in comparison with the value of −/−

b P < 0.05 by a Student’s t test in comparison with the value of +/−