Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2014 Sep 28;241(1):209–227. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2178-z

Calreticulin expression in relation to exchangeable Ca2+ level that changes dynamically during anthesis, progamic phase, and double fertilization in Petunia

Robert Lenartowski 1,, Anna Suwińska 2, Marta Lenartowska 2
PMCID: PMC4282720  PMID: 25262422

Abstract

Calcium (Ca2+) plays essential roles in plant sexual reproduction, but the sites and the mechanism of Ca2+ mobile storage during pollen–pistil interactions have not been fully defined. Because the Ca2+-buffering protein calreticulin (CRT) is able to bind and sequester Ca2+, it can serve as a mobile intracellular store of easily releasable Ca2+ and control its local concentration within the cytoplasm. Our previous studies showed an enhanced expression of Petunia hybrida CRT gene (PhCRT) during pistil transmitting tract maturation, pollen germination and tube outgrowth on the stigma, gamete fusion, and early embryogenesis. Here, we demonstrate that elevated expression of CRT results in the accumulation of this protein in response to anthesis, pollination, sperm cells deposition within the receptive synergid and fertilization, when the level of exchangeable Ca2+ changes dynamically. CRT localizes mainly to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi compartments in the pistil transmitting tract cells, germinated pollen/tubes, and sporophytic/gametophytic cells of the ovule and corresponds with loosely bound Ca2+. Additionally, the immunogold research shows, for the first time, highly selective CRT distribution in specific nuclear sub-domains. On the basis of our results, we discuss the possible functions of CRT with respect to the critical role of Ca2+ homeostasis during key events of the multi-step process of generative reproduction in angiosperms.

Keywords: Calcium homeostasis, Chaperone activity, Embryo sac, Nucleus, Pollen germination and tube growth, Receptive synergid, Stigma

Introduction

In flowering plants, Ca2+ is a critical regulator of pollen germination and recognition, directional growth of the pollen tube to the ovule, gamete fusion, and activation of the fertilized egg cell (see reviews by Ge et al. 2007; Hepler et al. 2012; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong 2013; Steinhorst and Kudla 2013). Ca2+ exists in living cells in three forms, each required for specific activities in cellular metabolism and physiological functions (see review by Ge et al. 2007): (1) insoluble covalently bound Ca2+ plays mainly a structural role; (2) cytosolic free Ca2+ acts as a second messenger, serving as an early product in multiple signal transduction pathways; and (3) loosely bound Ca2+ is typically associated with fixed and mobile anions and is in dynamic equilibrium with the free Ca2+. Stored Ca2+ is sequestered in different cell compartments (such as the cell wall) and specific organelles (such as the endoplasmic reticulum(ER)) where it can be associated with specific proteins that buffer and release Ca2+ to control its local concentration. This pool of Ca2+ is exchangeable and can transform into the other forms when and where it is needed. Different Ca2+ forms function in interactions of the male gametophyte (pollen grain and its structural component, the pollen tube) with the female sporophytic tissues (pistil transmitting tract and ovular somatic tissues) and female gametophyte (the embryo sac) (see reviews by Ge et al. 2007; Hepler et al. 2012; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong 2013; Steinhorst and Kudla 2013). The importance of Ca2+ in these processes suggests that Ca2+-binding proteins may also play some important roles during complicated communications of the male and female gametophytes in planta. A good candidate for providing this function in flowering plants is CRT. This multifunctional Ca2+-binding/buffering protein containing an ER targeting and retention signals, is highly expressed in eukaryotic cells, and has a variety of cellular functions, both inside and outside of the ER lumen (see reviews by Gelebart et al. 2005; Jia et al. 2009; Michalak et al. 2009; Thelin et al. 2011; Qiu et al. 2012a). CRT acts as a Ca2+-buffering lectin-like molecular chaperone involved in proper folding, quality control, and maturation of newly synthesized glycoproteins within the secretory pathway. Additionally, CRT plays a role in regulation of Ca2+ signaling and homeostasis.

CRTs have been identified in 15 different plant species belonging to gymno- and angiosperms (Menegazzi et al. 1993; Chen et al. 1994; Denecke et al. 1995; Hassan et al. 1995; Kwiatkowski et al. 1995; Napier et al. 1995; Dresselhaus et al. 1996; Lim et al. 1996; Opas et al. 1996; Coughlan et al. 1997; Nelson et al. 1997; Nardi et al. 1998; Navazio et al. 1998; Li and Komatsu 2000; Lenartowska et al. 2002, 2009; Jia et al. 2008). In plants, distinct expression patterns and posttranscriptional modifications of CRT contribute to the ability of this protein to have diverse roles. These include response to biotic and abiotic stresses such as pathogen attacks, cold, drought, salt, and exogenous phytohormones. Plant CRTs are also involved in regulation of complex processes such as gene expression via direct interactions with steroid receptors, nuclear transport, cell adhesion, immunity, regeneration, apoptosis, and cell-to-cell communication by plasmodesmata (see reviews by Jia et al. 2009; Thelin et al. 2011; Qiu et al. 2012a). Besides its main localization in the ER, CRT has been also found outside this compartment in plant cells, including Golgi stacks and secretory granules (Borisjuk et al. 1998; Navazio et al. 2002; Lenartowska et al. 2002, 2009; Nardi et al. 2006), tapetosome vesicles (Hsieh and Huang 2005), the cytosol (Lenartowska et al. 2002; Jia et al. 2008), protein bodies (Torres et al. 2001; Šamaj et al. 2008), nucleus (Denecke et al. 1995; Napier et al. 1995; Lenartowska et al. 2002), plasma membrane and the cell surface (Borisjuk et al. 1998; Lenartowska et al. 2002; Navazio et al. 2002), plasmodesmata (Baluška et al. 1999; Laporte et al. 2003; Chen et al. 2005; Lenartowska et al. 2009; Christensen et al. 2010), and the spindle apparatus of dividing cells (Denecke et al. 1995), indicating that plant CRTs may be involved in multiple cellular processes.

Work from our lab and others has provided evidence that CRT plays a role in plant sexual reproduction. CRT is expressed in flower organs including anthers and pistils (Nelson et al. 1997; Lenartowska et al. 2002, 2009; Nardi et al. 2006) as well as in pollen, pollen tubes, and sperm cells (Williams et al. 1997b; Nardi et al. 1998, 2006; Navazio et al. 1998; Lenartowska et al. 2002, 2009; Qin et al. 2009). Moreover, levels of CRT mRNA or protein are up-regulated during fertilization, embryogenesis, and seed maturation (Chen et al. 1994; Denecke et al. 1995; Dresselhaus et al. 1996; Coughlan et al. 1997; Nelson et al. 1997; Borisjuk et al. 1998; Navazio et al. 2002; Christensen et al. 2010). Given its Ca2+-binding/buffering property, CRT could effectively provide transient storage and release of Ca2+ during these processes. Our previous characterization of PhCRT mRNA expression patterns by Northern blot and in situ hybridization revealed enhanced expression of PhCRT during pistil transmitting tract maturation and at the beginning of the progamic phase, when pollen germinates and pollen tubes outgrow on the stigma (Lenartowski et al. 2014). Furthermore, we observed the highest level of PhCRT mRNA in the ovary at fertilization and during early embryogenesis. We speculated that these expression patterns indicate that CRT is involved in regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis during key events in sexual reproduction of flowering plants. Here, we have further tested this hypothesis by examining sites of intracellular exchangeable Ca2+ storage and by determining the level and localization of CRT during anthesis, pollen–pistil interactions, and gamete fusion in Petunia.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Commercial cultivars of Petunia hybrida were grown at room temperature. Whole pistils were dissected from unpollinated flower buds 1 day before anthesis, from unpollinated flowers at anthesis, and from flowers cross-pollinated with compatible pollen at anthesis. To examine stigma receptivity, successive growth of pollen tubes during the progamic phase and fertilization stage, pistils were dissected from unpollinated flowers and from flowers at different time points after pollination. Samples of stigmas, styles, and ovules were prepared according to the standard protocol to obtain semi-thin sections that were stained with 0.1 % methylene blue and observed by light microscopy. For immunoblot analysis, unpollinated and pollinated whole pistils or pistils divided into stigma–style and ovary fragments were used. Selected tissue samples of stigmas and ovules were also prepared for electron microscopy cytochemical and immunocytochemical studies according to the protocols as described below. All experiments were repeated at least three times during several growing seasons with similar results.

Localization of loosely bound Ca2+ by potassium antimonate precipitation

Samples of stigmas and ovules dissected from unpollinated and pollinated pistils were fixed with freshly prepared 2 % (w/v) potassium antimonate, 2 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde, and 2 % (v/v) formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (KH2PO4, pH 7.8) for 4 h at room temperature, and then subsequently postfixed with 1 % (v/v) osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in the same buffer-antimonate solution for 12 h at 4 °C. Next, samples were dehydrated in graduated ethanol concentrations and embedded in Poly/Bed 812 resin (Polysciences) according to the standard protocol. Ultra-thin longitudinal sections were collected on copper grids, stained with 2.5 % (w/v) uranyl acetate and 0.4 % (w/v) lead citrate solutions, and examined by transmission electron microscopy (Jeol EM 1010) at 80 kV. The presence of Ca2+ in the precipitates was confirmed previously using energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (Lenartowska et al. 1997; Bednarska et al. 2005).

Western blot analysis

100 mg of whole Petunia pistils or pistils divided into stigma–style fragments and ovaries were dissected from unpollinated and pollinated flowers, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until they were used. They were then homogenized in liquid nitrogen, and soluble proteins were extracted in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT plus 1 mM PMSF and cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The homogenates were centrifuged at 16,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations of the supernatants were measured with the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 12.0 % SDS–PAGE gel and then the proteins were semi-dry transferred to Amersham PVDF Hybond-P membrane (GE Healthcare). Blocked blots were probed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against maize CRT (CRT PAb) (Napier et al. 1995), washed, and probed with antibody against rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP, Sigma). Signal was detected with the Amersham ECL Advance Western Blotting Detection Kit according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (GE Healthcare). Membranes were stripped according to the manufacturer’s instruction (GE Healthcare) and re-probed with goat polyclonal antibody against Arabidopsis α-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and then with anti-goat IgG-HRP secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Detection was performed as described above. Each Western blot was performed a minimum of three times for each experiment, and representative blots shown. Quantification of signals was done with Image Gauge 3.4 software (Science Lab99). Statistical significance of data was determined by a one-way ANOVA test.

Immunogold localization of CRT

The samples of stigmas and ovules dissected from pollinated pistils were fixed with 4 % (v/v) formaldehyde and 0.25 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) for 1 h at room temperature (slight vacuum infiltration) followed by overnight fixation at 4 °C. Fixed samples were dehydrated in graduated ethanol concentrations, embedded in LR Gold resin (Fluka) according to the standard protocol, and ultra-thin longitudinal sections were collected on Formvar-coated nickel grids. The sections were then incubated with blocking solution containing 3 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS buffer, pH 7.2, for 5 min at room temperature, incubated in 1:20 dilution of a primary CRT PAb in PBS supplemented with 0.3 % (w/v) BSA for 2 h at room temperature, and then incubated with gold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (BBInternational), diluted 1:100 in PBS buffer with 0.2 % (w/v) BSA for 1.5 h at room temperature. In the control, incubation with the CRT PAb was omitted. Finally, the sections were stained with 2.5 % (w/v) uranyl acetate and 0.4 % (w/v) lead citrate solutions and examined by transmission electron microscopy as above.

Results

We previously used aniline blue to characterize the successive growth of the pollen tubes in Petunia pistil (Lenartowski et al. 2014). Here, using the semi-thin sections of Petunia stigmas, styles and ovules stained with methylene blue, we could detect two main stages before pollination and three main stages after pollination, covering pistil transmitting tract maturation, the progamic phase, and gamete fusion (Fig. 1). The subsequent stages were defined as: (1) the unpollinated immature pistil before anthesis without exudate on the stigma (UPI); (2) the unpollinated mature pistil at anthesis with exudate on the receptive stigma (UPM); (3) the first stage of the progamic phase, when pollen germinate and tubes outgrow on the stigma (PP1); the second stage of the progamic phase, when pollen tubes penetrate the stigma/style transmitting tract (PP2); and the third stage of the progamic phase, when pollen tubes grow into ovules (PP3) and fertilization can occur.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Methylene blue staining of Petunia stigmas, styles, and ovules before anthesis, at anthesis, during the progamic phase, and fertilization. a Longitudinal section of the stigma dissected from a flower bud (UPI pistil). b Longitudinal section of the stigma at anthesis (UPM pistil); in the stigma transmitting tract (sitt) at the receptive stage, the exudate fills intercellular spaces between the sitt cells and covers the stigma surface (arrows). c Cross section of the style transmitting tract (sytt) before pollination. d–f Longitudinal sections of the ovule dissected from the UPM pistil; sister synergids (sy) and the egg cell (ec) are located at the micropylar pole of the embryo sac (d), while the polar nuclei (pn) of the central cell and the antipodals (an) are located at the chalazal pole of the embryo sac (e and f, respectively). Analogous positions of these cells within the female gametophyte were observed after pollination during the first (PP1) and second (PP2) stages of the progamic phase (data not shown). g, h Longitudinal sections of the pollinated stigmas during the PP1 (g) and PP2 (h) stages; at the PP1 stage, pollen germinates and pollen tubes outgrow within the sitt, whereas at the PP2 stage, many germinated pollen grains are devoid of cytoplasm that has been displaced into the growing tubes. The sytt of the pistil during the PP1 stage is devoid of pollen tubes that penetrate sitt during this stage (data not shown). i Cross section of the sytt at the PP2 stage; cytoplasmic apical/sub-apical zones of growing pollen tubes are visible between sytt cells (arrows). j, k Longitudinal section of the stigma and cross section of the sytt at the PP3 stage (respectively); both regions of the pistil are fully penetrated by the pollen tubes, and their vacuolized zones are visible between degenerated sytt cells (arrows in k). l–q Longitudinal sections of the ovule at the late stage of the progamic phase (PP3) during pollen tube rupture within the receptive synergid (l–n) and at fertilization (o–q); the sperm cells are released within the receptive synergid (l); the highly active egg cell (ec, m) and the central cell (cc, n) are both located at the micropylar pole of the embryo sac just before gamete fusion; a diploid zygote (zy, o), degenerating antipodals (p), and developing endosperm (en, q) are present within the embryo sac at the fertilization stage. Cartoons explain the position of the sections along the pistil. es embryo sac, ex exudate, gn generative nucleus, ii inter integument, mi micropyle, nu nucellus, oi outer integument, ov ovule, pg pollen grain, pl placenta, pt pollen tube, sn sperm nucleus, vn vegetative nucleus. Bars 100 μm (a, g, h, j), 20 μm (b, c, i, k), 10 μm (d–f, l–q)

Distribution of loosely bound Ca2+ in stigmas and ovules before and after pollination

The intracellular sites of Ca2+ storage during pollen–pistil interactions have not been fully described. Thus, we used potassium antimonate precipitation to compare distribution of exchangeable Ca2+ in stigmas and ovules at selected stages before and after pollination.

Stigmas

In UPI pistil before anthesis, we observed few electron-dense Ca2+ precipitates (Ca2+ ppts) in the cytoplasm of stigma transmitting tract (sitt) cells (Fig. 2a, b). At this stage, Ca2+ ppts were found associated with vesicles under the cell wall (Fig. 2a) as well as in the ER and Golgi stacks (Fig. 2b). At the UPI stage, Ca2+ ppts were prevalent in the nuclei and nucleoli of sitt cells (Fig. 2c, d). The Petunia stigma is wet, due to secretion at the receptive stage. During anthesis at the UPM stage, exudate is secreted to the extracellular matrix (ecm) of sitt (Fig. 1b, arrows). At this stage, we observed numerous Ca2+ ppts in the electron-dense exudate that filled the intercellular spaces between sitt cells (Fig. 2e) and that covered the receptive stigma (Fig. 2g). In the cytoplasm of the sitt cells Ca2+ ppts accumulated mainly in the ER cisternae and Golgi stacks (Fig. 2i). They were also associated with some vesicles present in peripheral cytoplasm (Fig. 2f). At anthesis, Ca2+ ppts were still prevalent in the nuclei and nucleoli of sitt cells (Fig. 2h).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Localization of loosely bound Ca2+ by potassium antimonate precipitation in the Petunia sitt before and at anthesis. a–d Sitt of the UPI pistil before anthesis. e–i Sitt of UPM pistil at anthesis. Cartoon shows the analyzed regions of the UPI and UPM pistils. ecm extracellular matrix, er endoplasmic reticulum, ex exudate, g Golgi stack, m mitochondrium, n nucleus, no nucleolus, p plastid, v vesicle. Bars 1 μm (a, c–h), 500 nm (b, i)

In the PP1 stage, when pollination starts, there was no obvious change in the level of Ca2+ ppts in the stigma ecm or within the cytoplasm of the sitt cells. We detected Ca2+ ppts extracellularly in the electron-dense exudate (Fig. 3a) and intracellularly in the ER, and in dictyosomes (Fig. 3b). One clear difference between the UPM and PP1 stages was that there were far fewer Ca2+ ppts in the nuclei of sitt cells at the PP1 stage; only single ppts were observed in the chromatin (Fig. 3a, arrow). After pollination, numerous germinated pollen grains and outgrowing tubes were observed on the receptive stigma (Fig. 1g). At the beginning of the progamic phase, pollen tubes penetrate the secretory sitt but do not enter the style transmitting tract (sytt). At this stage, Ca2+ ppts most strongly labeled the cytoplasm of germinated pollen, where they were found in the ER (Fig. 3c, d). These ppts were also present within the germinal aperture (Fig. 3e), where they accumulated in the ER cisternae (Fig. 3f). Numerous Ca2+ ppts were also found in the sitt ecm, adjacent to the outgrowing apex of the pollen tube (Fig. 3e, arrows). A similar high level of Ca2+ ppts was observed in the growing pollen tubes, particularly in their apical and sub-apical zones (Fig. 3g–j). In the tube apex, Ca2+ ppts were localized mainly in numerous cytoplasmic vesicles (Fig. 3g) or adjacent to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3g, arrow). In the sub-tip zone of the pollen tube, Ca2+ ppts were associated with Golgi stacks (Fig. 3h) and electron-transparent or electron-dense vesicles (Fig. 3h, arrows). We observed the largest number of both small and large Ca2+ ppts in the ER, which is the most prominent organelle in the sub-apical zone of the growing tube (Fig. 3i, j). However, the ER cisternae of some pollen tubes were devoid of Ca2+ ppts (Fig. 3k). In such tubes, Ca2+ ppts were localized preferentially at the cell wall. This result suggests that accumulation of exchangeable Ca2+ within the ER may be temporary. At the PP1 stage, a large number of Ca2+ ppts was also observed between the growing tube and the degenerating sitt cell, at the zones of local adhesion between the tube and the ecm of the sitt (Fig. 3i). Together, these results indicate that a significant increase of exchangeable Ca2+ level occurs during two important events: intensified secretory activity of the maturing sitt at anthesis and pollen germination/outgrowth of pollen tubes on the stigma.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Localization of loosely bound Ca2+ by potassium antimonate precipitation in the Petunia sitt at the PP1 stage. ab The sitt after pollination. c–f sections of germinated pollen grain (pg) with the germinal aperture (ga). g–k cross sections of different zones of the growing pollen tube (pt); apical zone with numerous vesicles (g) and sub-apical zone (h–k) containing Golgi stacks (g) and ER cisternae (er). Cartoon shows the analyzed region of the pistil at the PP1 stage. a amyloplast, ecm extracellular matrix, ex exudate, n nucleus, no nucleolus, p plastid, s sporoderm, v vesicle. Bars 1 μm (a, c, e, g, i), 500 nm (b, d, f, h, jk)

Ovules

The female gametophyte of Petunia develops according to the Polygonum type and consists of two synergids, the egg cell, the central cell containing two polar nuclei, and three antipodals (Fig. 1d–f). During the late stage of the progamic phase (PP3), pollen tube grows along the placenta and reaches the micropylar end of the ovule, where the embryo sac is located. Then the pollen tube directly enters the receptive synergid and releases male gametes, commonly called the sperm cells (Fig. 1l, arrows). One of the sperm cells fuses with the haploid egg cell (Fig. 1m) to generate a diploid zygote/embryo (Fig. 1o), whereas the second one fuses with a diploid central cell (Fig. 1n) to form a nursing tissue, the triploid endosperm (Fig. 1q).

Before pollination, at the UPM stage, we did not observe numerous Ca2+ ppts in the placenta (Fig. 4a), somatic cells of the ovule micropylar end (Fig. 4b), and inside the embryo sac, including the sister synergids (Fig. 4c), the egg cell (Fig. 4d), the central cell (Fig. 4e), or the antipodals (Fig. 4f). Instead, during the PP3 stage, when pollen tubes grew into the receptive synergid and fertilization occurred, a drastic increase of Ca2+ ppts was observed both in the placenta and in the ovule (Fig. 5). Ca2+ ppts were evident extracellularly between the placenta surface and the micropylar region of the ovule (Fig. 5a). Inside the placenta cells, numerous Ca2+ ppts were localized in the ER (Fig. 5b) and nucleus (Fig. 5c). We also observed Ca2+ ppts in nucellus cells, particularly at the micropylar end of the ovule. They were prominent in the nucellus cell cytoplasm (Fig. 5d), including the ER (Fig. 5e, f) and Golgi stacks (Fig. 5f), and also in the nucleus (Fig. 5d). However, the highest concentration of Ca2+ ppts was in the receptive synergid, both in the cytoplasm and in the filiform apparatus (Fig. 5g), a structure along which the pollen tube elongates (Fig. 5h). Numerous Ca2+ ppts were also found in the ER surrounding the sperm cells released in the synergid (Fig. 5i) and in the synergid nucleus (Fig. 5j). Within the receptive synergid, an extremely large mass of Ca2+ ppts was observed in the cytoplasm near the location of sperm cells deposition. In this area, Ca2+ ppts were localized in the ER and in large patches near this cell compartment (Fig. 5k). Ca2+ ppts were also common in the egg cell (Fig. 5m, n) and in the central cell (Fig. 5l, q). In these cells, Ca2+ ppts were present both in the nuclei and cytoplasmic organelles such as the ER and dictyosomes. The level of Ca2+ ppts was higher in the zygote and endosperm after fertilization (Fig. 5o, p, respectively); at this stage, numerous Ca2+ ppts were evident in the nuclei and nucleoli and within the cytoplasm, where numerous ER cisternae and Golgi stacks were present (Fig. 5r, s). The lowest concentration of Ca2+ ppts was in the antipodals located at the chalazal end of the embryo sac (Fig. 5t). Overall, our data indicate that the level of exchangeable Ca2+ increases substantially during the processes of pollen tube entry in the receptive synergid, gamete fusion, and early embryogenesis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Localization of loosely bound Ca2+ by potassium antimonate precipitation in the Petunia placental tissue and at the micropylar end of the ovule before pollination. a Placenta tissue (pl); b the micropyle (mi) of the ovule (ov); c sister synergids (sy); d the egg cell (ec); e the polar nuclei (pn) of the central cell (cc); f antipodals (an). Cartoon shows the ovule of the UPM pistil. a amyloplast, af filiform apparatus, es embryo sac, ii inter integument, n nucleus, no nucleolus nu nucellus, oi outer integument, va vacuole. Bars 2 μm

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Localization of loosely bound Ca2+ by potassium antimonate precipitation in the Petunia placental tissue and at the micropylar end of the ovule during the PP3 stage and at fertilization. a–c Placenta tissue (pl); d–f nucellus (nu); g–k the receptive synergid (sy) penetrated by the pollen tube (pt); l, q the central cell (cc); m, n the egg cell (ec); o, r the diploid zygote (zy); p, s the developing endosperm (en); t degenerating antipodals (an). Cartoons show the ovules at the PP3 stage during sperm cells deposition within the receptive synergid and at fertilization. a amyloplast, af filiform apparatus, er endoplasmic reticulum, es embryo sac, g Golgi stack, ii inter integument, l lipid drop, m mitochondrium, n nucleus, no nucleolus, oi outer integument, ov ovule, pn polar nuclei, sn sperm nucleus, sp sperm cell, va vacuole. Bars 2 μm (a, cd, gm, o–p, t), 1 μm (n), 500 nm (b, e, f, q–s)

CRT expression profiles before pollination, during the progamic phase, and at fertilization

If our hypothesis that CRT functions to regulate levels of exchangeable Ca2+ in response to anthesis, pollination, and finally fertilization is correct, then we would expect CRT levels to mirror the increase we observed in levels of Ca2+ ppts during these processes. To test this, we first performed Western blot analysis of total Petunia pistil proteins isolated at the different stages. Using the CRT PAb that we have previously demonstrated to be specific for CRT in Petunia pistils (Lenartowska et al. 2002), we detected bands that appear to be doublets (Fig. 6a, b, lines 1–3) or single bands (all other). The CRT PAb likely cross-reacts with the two family members (CRT1 and CRT2 isoforms) that share high sequence homology and functionally compensate each other, and are highly expressed in reproductive tissues (see review by Jia et al. 2009).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Western blot analysis of Petunia CRT levels in whole pistils (a), stigma–style fragments (b), and ovaries (c) before pollination and during subsequent stages of the progamic phase. Graphs show the relative CRT levels (mean of three replicates and standard deviation) normalized to the Petunia tubulin (TUB) levels. Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA (ns not significant; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001). Representative Western blots are shown under the graphs. UPI unpollinated immature pistil, UPM unpollinated mature pistil, PP1-PP3 subsequent stages of the progamic phase

Our Western blot experiments showed a gradual increase of the CRT level in whole pistils from the UPI stage to the beginning of the progamic phase and peaking at the PP1 stage (Fig. 6a). A small decrease ~25 % in the CRT level was observed at the PP2 stage, during pollen tube elongation within the pistil, but the level was higher again at the end of the progamic phase, PP3. We speculated that the two peaks of CRT level observed at the PP1 and PP3 stages in whole pistils might reflect increases in CRT level during pollination and fertilization. To assess this possibility, we repeated the immunoblot experiments with protein extracts isolated from the stigma–style and ovary fragments of pistils. In the stigma–style fragments, the levels of CRT expression at the UPI, UPM, and PP1 stages were similar to those observed in the whole pistils (compare Fig. 6a and b). The highest level of CRT expression in the upper part of the pistil was detected at the PP1 stage, when pollen germinated and tubes were outgrowing on the stigma (Fig. 6b). Next, when tubes elongated within the pistil style, the CRT level decreased, reaching its lowest value at the PP3 stage (Fig. 6b). By contrast, CRT levels remained constant in the ovaries at the UPI, UPM, and PP1 stages (Fig. 6c). However, we observed a more than twofold increase in the CRT protein level in the ovary at the PP2 stage, and the level of CRT increased another ~40 % at the PP3 stage, when pollen tubes grow into the ovules resulting fertilization (Fig. 6c). These peaks of CRT protein expression at PP1 in the stigma–style region and at PP3 in the ovary correlate well with our earlier quantitation of PhCRT mRNA levels (Lenartowski et al. 2014). Furthermore, these peaks of CRT levels correspond with two key events resulting from pollination: (1) rapid pollen germination and tube outgrowth on the stigma, and (2) pollen tube entry into the embryo sac and fertilization.

Immunolocalization of CRT in the stigma and ovule at selected stages after pollination

We next sought to determine the localization of CRT in the sitt at the PP1 stage and in the ovule at the PP3 stage, the stages at which our Western blot and Ca2+ labeling experiments showed that CRT and exchangeable Ca2+ levels changed most dynamically in the particular pistil regions. To do so, we performed immuno-electron microscopy with the CRT PAb and a gold-conjugated secondary antibody.

Just after pollination, CRT protein was detected in the sitt cell nuclei and cytoplasm. With the immunogold technique, we were able to distinguish CRT localization in defined nucleus sub-domains, such as condensed chromatin (Fig. 7a), perichromatin areas (Fig. 7b, arrows), the nucleolus (Fig. 7a, arrowheads), and the nucleolus-associated chromatin (Fig. 7a, arrow). Within the cytoplasm of sitt cells, CRT was present in the Golgi stacks (Fig. 7c) and in the ER (Fig. 7d). In germinated pollen grains, accumulation of CRT was observed in the germinal aperture (Fig. 7e), where dictyosomes, vesicles, and the ER were evident in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7f, g). A similar CRT labeling pattern was revealed in the cytoplasm of the sub-apical zone of the growing pollen tube. Numerous gold traces were localized in the Golgi stacks, electron-dense vesicles, and the ER (Fig. 7h, i). The control sections in which no CRT PAb was used were devoid of labeling (Fig. 7j–m).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Immunogold localization of CRT in the Petunia sitt at the PP1 stage. a–d Sitt cells; e–g germinated pollen grain (pg); h, i sub-apical zone of the growing pollen tube (pt). The control sections in which no CRT PAb was used were devoid of labeling (j–m). Cartoon shows the analyzed region of the pistil at the PP1 stage. ch chromatin, g Golgi stack, ga germinal aperture, er endoplasmic reticulum, ex exudate, m mitochondrium, n nucleus, no nucleolus, s sporoderm, v vesicle. Bars 1 μm (e), 500 nm (ad, fm)

At the PP3 stage, CRT labeling was evident in the placenta, the nucellus, and in highly specialized cells of the female gametophyte located at the micropylar pole of the embryo sac, including the receptive synergid and the egg cell (Fig. 8). In the somatic cells of the placenta and the nucellus, CRT was localized in the nuclei (Fig. 8a, b), where it associated with the condensed chromatin, perichromatin areas (Fig. 8a, b, arrowheads), and the nuclear body near the nucleolus (Fig. 8b). Gold traces were found also in the ER (Fig. 8c), including the ER adjacent to the nuclear envelope (Fig. 8a, arrows). The high level of CRT labeling was found in the receptive synergid, particularly within the filiform apparatus, where gold traces were uniformly distributed along the electron-dense fibrils (Fig. 8d), and in the region of the cytoplasm above the site of sperm cells deposition (Fig. 8e, arrows). This cytoplasmic region was extremely rich in the ER cisternae strongly labeled by the CRT antibody (Fig. 8f, g). Some gold traces were also found in the synergid nucleus (Fig. 8e, f), and nucleolus (Fig. 8f, arrowheads) as well as in the nuclear envelope (Fig. 8f, arrows). We observed CRT in the sperm cell deposited within the receptive synergid, both in the sperm nucleus and around the male gamete (Fig. 8h, arrows). At higher magnification, we could discern ER cisternae adjacent to the sperm cell (Fig. 8i). Because the egg cell has very little cytoplasm at the PP3 stage, it was very difficult to clearly identify the organelles labeled by the CRT PAb. However, we found a very specific CRT localization in the egg cell nucleus, where we observed numerous gold traces in the nucleolus (Fig. 8j, marked region and the inset, i) and in a tract within the chromatin (Fig. 8j, arrows).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Immunogold localization of CRT in the Petunia placental tissue and at the micropylar end of the ovule at the PP3 stage. a Placenta tissue (pl); b, c nucellus (nu); d–i the receptive synergid (sy) at the moment of the sperm cells (sp) release; j the egg cell (ec). Inset (i) in j shows a bigger magnification of the marked region in the ec nucleolus (no). Cartoon shows the ovule at the PP3 stage during sperm cells deposition within the sy. af filiform apparatus, an antipodals, ch chromatin, er endoplasmic reticulum, es embryo sac, ii inter integument, m mitochondrium, n nucleus, nb nuclear body, oi outer integument, pn polar nuclei, pt pollen tube, sn sperm nucleus. Bars 500 nm

After fertilization, CRT labeling was strongest in the zygote (Fig. 9a–c) and in the developing endosperm (Fig. 9d, e). In these cells, CRT was localized in the nucleus, nucleolus, Golgi stacks, and the ER, including the ER adjacent to the nuclear envelope of the zygote (Fig. 9a, arrows).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Immunogold localization of CRT in the Petunia embryo sac (es) at fertilization. a–c The diploid zygote (zy); d, e the developing endosperm (en). Cartoon shows the ovule at fertilization. af filiform apparatus, an antipodals, g Golgi stack, er endoplasmic reticulum, ii inter integument, m mitochondrium, n nucleus, no nucleolus, nu nucellus, oi outer integument, pn polar nuclei, pl placenta, pt pollen tube, sn sperm nucleus, sy synergid. Bars 500 nm

Discussion

Here we have demonstrated that both CRT and exchangeable Ca2+ have dynamic localization patterns during two key events of plant sexual reproduction: (1) anthesis and pollination resulting in pollen germination and tube outgrowth on the stigma, and (2) pollen tube entry into the receptive synergid, resulting in gamete fusion and embryogenesis.

CRT is highly expressed in the receptive stigma where pollen germinates and tubes outgrow

This is the first study to fully characterize the sites of exchangeable Ca2+ and CRT during the complicated intercellular communication that occurs between the male gametophyte and the female sporophyte/gametophyte cells. Although both external and internal Ca2+ stores are likely important in this process, most previous research has focused on the essential role of the ecm in Ca2+ storage and mobilization during pollen–pistil interactions. The ER and Golgi stacks are known to be the effective intracellular Ca2+ stores (see review by Vandecaetsbeek et al. 2011), and here we provide evidence that these are prominent sites of intracellular Ca2+ storage during anthesis, and then pollen germination and tube outgrowth.

We observed that the level of loosely bound Ca2+ increased at anthesis in both the sitt ecm and in the cytoplasm of the sitt cells, where Ca2+ ppts accumulated mainly in the ER, Golgi stacks, and vesicles. This high level of exchangeable Ca2+ was constant until after pollination. Pollen germination and tube growth are known to require Ca2+ (see reviews by Ge et al. 2007; Hepler et al. 2012; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong 2013; Steinhorst and Kudla 2013). In the pistil, the optimal level of Ca2+ required for these process is provided by the pistil transmitting tract. Whereas most studies have focused on Ca2+ storage and mobilization from the ecm during pollen–pistil interactions, Iwano et al. (2004) observed that pollination in Arabidopsis induces an increase of cytosolic Ca2+ in stigma papilla and that this is followed by a gradient of cytosolic Ca2+ in hydrated pollen grains. These authors speculated that this pre-germination gradient is generated by the influx of Ca2+ from the papillar cells. Although it is not clear whether the Ca2+ comes from the cytoplasm or the cell wall of the stigma papilla, our present work in Petunia suggests that CRT localized in the ER and Golgi stacks of the sitt cells may provide an exchangeable Ca2+ store that can be mobilized at anthesis and during pollination.

The immunoblots revealed a gradual increase in CRT level in the upper part of the pistil from the UPI stage to the beginning of the progamic phase; the highest CRT expression level was at the PP1 stage, when pollen germinates and tubes outgrow on the receptive stigma. During this stage, the immunogold experiments clearly showed that CRT accumulated in the cytoplasm of the germinal pollen aperture and in the cytoplasm of the sub-apical zone of outgrowing tubes, where the labeling was associated with abundant ER cisternae, Golgi stacks, and vesicles. This localization pattern of CRT corresponds well with the high level of loosely bound Ca2+ in the same compartments, strongly suggesting that this pool of Ca2+ is bound by CRT. It has long been known that growing pollen tubes possess a localized gradient of cytosolic Ca2+ at their apex and that an extracellular Ca2+ influx occurs at this site (see reviews by Hepler et al. 2012; Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong 2013; Steinhorst and Kudla 2013). This stable, tip-focused Ca2+ gradient is essential for many cellular processes that determine directional pollen tube growth, such as vesicle secretion at the tube tip, cell wall synthesis, tip reorientation, and proper organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, which differs between the shank and the apical zone of the tube. However, how this Ca2+ gradient is sensed and mediated was unknown. We propose that CRT in the ER and Golgi compartments of the pollen tube sub-apical cytoplasm is a key element of the mechanism that allows effective sequestration of free Ca2+ from the tube apex. Thus, CRT may play an important role in storing intracellular Ca2+ and releasing it when and where it is needed. A key piece of data in support of this idea is our finding that enrichment for exchangeable Ca2+ in the ER of the sub-apical zone of the pollen tube was temporary. This finding suggests that the mechanism of modulating local Ca2+ concentration within the tube cytoplasm is oscillatory and may correlate with fluctuations in the pollen tube tip-focused Ca2+ gradient and other growth oscillations of the pollen tube. CRT likely plays an analogous role during pollen tube directional elongation to the ovary because we have previously observed similar distributions of CRT and exchangeable Ca2+ in the pollen tubes and sytt cells within the Petunia and Haemanthus pistils (Lenartowska et al. 1997, 2002, 2009).

We previously found that the highest level of PhCRT mRNA expression was in the stigma–style fragment of UPI pistil (Lenartowski et al. 2014). In addition, we observed a higher level of PhCRT transcripts in the sitt cells before anthesis than in UPM pistil. Together, these results indicate that PhCRT transcription in sitt cells starts as early as the flower bud stage, whereas CRT translation is postponed and reaches maximum level at anthesis and pollination. During anthesis, the exudate fills intercellular spaces between the sitt cells and covers the receptive Petunia stigma. The stigma thus becomes wet due to the high secretory activity of these specialized cells. High levels of CRT have been observed in other plant tissues that are secretory in nature, such as the aleurone layer of the barley caryopsis (Dedhar 1994), nectaries of Arabidopsis flowers (Nelson et al. 1997), endothelium of the integument in Nicotiana fertilized ovules (Borisjuk et al. 1998), and the active tapetum of Nicotiana anthers (Nardi et al. 2006). Secretory cells are characterized by very high rates of protein synthesis, the ER cisternae, and numerous dictyosomes in close association with the plasma membrane. We have observed similar ultrastructure in the Petunia sitt cells, in which CRT was highly abundant. Our immunogold experiments further revealed that CRT preferentially localizes to the ER and Golgi stacks of sitt cells during the PP1 stage. Thus, we suggest that in addition to regulating Ca2+ homeostasis, the high level of CRT expression in the Petunia sitt reflects a role for CRT as a chaperone to achieve high secretory activity of the sitt specialized cells to ensure the stigma receptivity.

The highest levels of exchangeable Ca2+ and CRT in the ovary correspond with pollen tube entry into the embryo sac and double fertilization

Pollen tube extends through the pistil transmitting tract and is guided to ovule where it releases two sperm cells in the receptive synergid for fertilization. Our previous (Lenartowski et al. 2014) and present reports support the hypothesis that CRT is required to maintain Ca2+ homeostasis during both restricted sperm cell release and gamete fusion. First, the Western blot analysis showed that the highest level of CRT expression correspond with these events. Second, we observed a dramatic increase in the level of loosely bound Ca2+ at the micropylar end of the ovule where pollen tube penetration and fertilization occur. We found numerous Ca2+ ppts in the ER and dictyosomes of somatic placental and nucellus cells as well as in the female gametophyte. Third, we saw a large mass of Ca2+ ppts in the ER and Golgi stacks of the receptive synergid during sperm cells deposition and in the zygote and developing endosperm. Finally, we previously reported accumulation of PhCRT mRNA within the receptive synergid, the zygote, and the endosperm (Lenartowski et al. 2014). Our results are consistent with other reports that confirm up-regulation of CRT expression at fertilization or during embryo development in other plant species (Chen et al. 1994; Dresselhaus et al. 1996; Nelson et al. 1997; Borisjuk et al. 1998). These authors speculated that CRT is required for rapid cell divisions of the zygote and early endosperm or for proper folding of the proteins that are actively synthesized by the developing embryo and nutritive tissue. Recent beautiful experiments in Arabidopsis have shown that the CRT3 isoform, together with another ER luminal protein, POD1, regulate the pollen tube response to female gametophyte signals and cell plate patterning during early embryogenesis (Li et al. 2011). These authors speculated that POD1, via modulating CRT3 function, plays a key role in the ER quality control system and/or modulates cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis and its regional concentration by tethering CRT3. However, unlike the highly acidic C-domains in the Arabidopsis CRT1/2 isoforms and their mammalian counterpart CRT1, the C-domain of the Arabidopsis CRT3 isoform does not have high-capacity Ca2+-binding ability (Qiu et al. 2012b). We previously demonstrated that the PhCRT that is expressed in Petunia pistil belongs to the CRT1/CRT2 subclass (Lenartowski et al. 2014); this class generally functions as ER chaperones involved in protein folding and Ca2+ homeostasis (see review by Jia et al. 2009). Taken together, our previous and present research suggest that the CRT protein expressed in the Petunia ovule functions mainly as a mobile Ca2+ store and regulator of Ca2+ homeostasis during the last stage of the progamic phase and at fertilization. This idea is consistent with the fact that both gamete fusion and fertilized egg activation are Ca2+-related processes (see review by Ge et al. 2007). We do not exclude that CRT highly expressed during fertilization and early embryogenesis may also function as the ER chaperone as other authors suggest.

One of our most interesting observations was that both CRT and exchangeable Ca2+ were concentrated within the filiform apparatus and the cytoplasm of the receptive synergid, above the site of sperm cells deposition. CRT and exchangeable Ca2+ were localized mainly in the ER, which is prominent in the synergid cytoplasm and surrounding the sperm cells. Our previous work likewise revealed that the highest concentration of PhCRT mRNA was in this same cytoplasmic region of the receptive synergid (Lenartowski et al. 2014). These findings are consistent with reports that, of all the cells in the embryo sac, the highest level of loosely bound Ca2+ is in the receptive synergid (see review by Ge et al. 2007). Furthermore, a dramatic increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+ occurs in the receptive synergid at pollen tube rupture in Arabidopsis (Iwano et al. 2012). It is still unknown whether the Ca2+ is delivered from the ecm, the ER, or both. Several functions have been proposed for the filiform apparatus, including pollen tube reception, import of metabolites, and export of the pollen tube attractants, and numerous proteins have been found to localize in this highly specialized compartment (see review by Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong 2013). We postulate that CRT may provide an exchangeable Ca2+ store in the receptive synergid and modulate the local concentration of Ca2+ to prevent extra pollen tubes from entering the embryo sac. Interestingly, we observed large patches of Ca2+ ppts above the released sperm cells within the receptive synergid. We also found the ER cisternae enriched with CRT in this same location. These findings are consistent with a report of CRT patches in Nicotiana; these were interpreted to serve as a specific Ca2+ storage mechanism (Borisjuk et al. 1998). Alternatively, CRT may be involved in regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis during positioning of the male gametes for fusion with the female gametes. The two released sperm cells migrate to fertilize the egg cell and the central cell, and this movement of non-motile male gametes within the embryo sac appears to depend on actin-myosin interactions (Fu et al. 2000; Ye et al. 2002). Actin dynamics is a Ca2+-dependent process, and Ca2+ regulates the activities of many actin-binding proteins.

Although the precise mechanism is unclear, maintenance of an optimal Ca2+ environment within the female gametophyte is essential for fertilization. CRT is an excellent candidate to fulfill this role. We proposed this idea previously when we observed a micropylar-chalazal gradient of PhCRT mRNA in the receptive synergid (Lenartowski et al. 2014). Our findings here support this hypothesis because we found long ER cisternae surrounding the sperm cells in the synergid, and this structure was enriched with CRT and exchangeable Ca2+. Additionally, we have detected both CRT and Ca2+ in Petunia sperm cells released within the receptive synergid. In animals, the CRT2 isoform is highly expressed in testes (Persson et al. 2002), and CRT is localized with spherical spermatids and mature sperm (Nakamura et al. 1993; Naaby-Hansen et al. 2001; Ho and Suarez 2003). CRT and Ca2+ oscillations have also been reported in maize sperm cells (Williams et al. 1997a, b), and CRT localizes to spermatids in the higher alga Chara (Popłońska 2013). Together, these results strongly suggest that CRT serves unique functions within the male gametes, but their determination requires further study.

Potential role of CRT in the nucleus

Here we report the presence of CRT in the nuclei of several Petunia pistil sporophytic and gametophytic cells such as secretory sitt cells, somatic cells of the placenta and nucellus, the haploid receptive synergid, the egg cell, the zygote, and the triploid endosperm. In these cells, CRT localized to the nuclear envelope and to different nuclear sub-domains. CRT has been suggested to have a function in the nucleus owing to its putative nuclear localization signal (NLS; see review by Michalak et al. 1992). Additionally, immunofluorescence studies have revealed CRT in the nuclear envelope, nuclear matrix, and nucleolus in some animal cells (see reviews by Michalak et al. 1992, 2009; Gelebart et al. 2005). Nuclear-localized CRT has been implicated in steroid-sensitive gene expression, export of steroid hormone receptors to the cytoplasm, and modulation of stability of certain mRNAs. In addition, CRT has been detected in association with histones in mitotic chromosomes (Kobayashi et al. 2006) and with peripheral chromatin in the nucleus of the protozoan Trypanosoma (Souto-Padrón et al. 2004). Given the presence of Ca2+ on the axis of metaphase chromosomes (Strick et al. 2001) and the high Ca2+ storage capacity of CRT, these reports suggest that CRT stores exchangeable Ca2+ to supply Ca2+-dependent scaffold proteins that regulate the dynamics of chromatin fibers.

Plant CRT has been also found in the nuclear envelope (Denecke et al. 1995; Napier et al. 1995) and within the nucleus (Lenartowska et al. 2002). Using a transient expression assay, Jia et al. (2008) demonstrated that a wheat CRT3 isoform coupled to green fluorescent protein (GFP) localized to both the nucleus and cytosol of living onion epidermal cells. Moreover, during spermiogenesis in the green alga Chara, CRT co-localized with protamine-type proteins within the spermatid nucleus, on chromatin, and in the extensive system of ER cisternae and vesicles connected to the nuclear envelope (Popłońska 2013). The author suggested that CRT participates in the exchange of nuclear proteins that allow for extreme chromatin condensation during spermatogenesis. Our present research showed that CRT localized within chromatin, including the condensed chromatin, the perichromatin areas, the nucleolus, nucleolus-associated chromatin, and nuclear bodies (probably Cajal bodies) of several Petunia pistil cell types. Several theories could explain the functional importance of CRT within the nucleus. Perichromatin fibrils are the sites of transcription and co-transcriptional processing of pre-mRNA and maturation of pre-RNA/mRNA (see review by Biggiogera et al. 2008), and Cajal bodies are important elements of the mRNA splicing system (see review by Shaw and Brown 2004). Therefore, CRT associated with these nuclear sub-domains may be involved in regulating a large spectrum of nuclear processes. Additionally, CRT may play a role in ribosome biogenesis or other functions of the nucleolus (see review by Shaw and Brown 2011). In the egg cell nucleus, we observed CRT localization in the nucleolus and as a distinguishable tract within the chromatin. Thus, CRT may be involved in nuclear/nucleolar transport of macromolecules.

We found that CRT’s localization in the nuclear envelope and within the nuclei of different Petunia pistil cell types corresponded with sites of exchangeable Ca2+. This could indicate that CRT modulates nuclear Ca2+ homeostasis by regulating the local Ca2+ concentration. The lumen of the nuclear envelope is contiguous with the lumen of the ER and can form a branching intra-nuclear network (see review by Gomes et al. 2006). This structure, called the nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR) in animals, can occasionally be observed in plants. Like the ER, the NR could serve as a mobile store of Ca2+ (see review by Mazars et al. 2011), which has been shown to play a role in transcriptional regulation in plants (see review by Ranty et al. 2012). This idea is strengthened by the fact that some components necessary for inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (InsP3)-mediated Ca2+ signaling were found in both the nuclear envelope and the NR of animal cells. Existence of such Ca2+-signaling machinery has also been confirmed in purified tobacco nuclei. InsP3 induces release of Ca2+ from both the nuclear envelope and the NR into the nucleoplasm, resulting in generation of physiologically important Ca2+ signals that can be recognized by Ca2+-binding proteins involved in signaling. This is also a mechanism of maintaining nuclear Ca2+ homeostasis (see reviews by Gomes et al. 2006; Ranty et al. 2012).

Nuclear localization might be unexpected given that plant CRT has typical ER targeting and retention (HDEL) signals and is usually found primarily in the ER. However, the rough ER is continuous with the outer nuclear membrane, and some authors suggest a possible function of CRT in the lumen of the ER/nuclear envelope rather than in the nucleoplasm. By contrast, our present immunogold research shows, for the first time, highly selective CRT localization in specific nuclear sub-domains. How CRT could leave the ER and move into the nucleus remains unknown. Possible explanations include production of splice variants that can localize to both places, posttranslational modifications such as glycosylation, degradation of the C-domain containing HDEL, or enzymatic modification of the glycan complexity (see reviews by Johnson et al. 2001; Michalak et al. 2009). Experiments by Brandizzi et al. (2003) suggest that CRT can be actively transported to the nucleus on microtubules. They observed that misfolded GFP-CRT (different subunits of CRT) was retrogradely transported from the ER lumen to the cytosol and nucleoplasm in plants. CRT may also enter the nucleus as a protein complex. For example, Sharma et al. (2004) characterized a nuclear protein (CRTintP) that strongly interacts with CRT in rice, contains an NLS, and localizes to the nuclei of onion epidermal cells. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation confirmed the existence of a CRT-CRTintP complex in vivo in stressed leaf tissue, suggesting a role for these proteins in controlling stress responsive genes. Despite these findings, it still remains unclear why CRT is not universally observed in the nucleus, and further investigations are needed to explain its roles in this compartment.

In conclusion, our results suggest that the precise regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis during anthesis and pollen–pistil interactions in plants depends on intracellular Ca2+ stores and CRT. CRT’s Ca2+-binding/buffering property is probably essential to control mobilization of stored Ca2+ from the ER, Golgi compartments, and nuclei. We consider the possibility that CRT enters nuclei only during certain events, such as generative reproduction in plants. Additionally, CRT’s role as a molecular chaperone may be equally important because a high rate of protein synthesis is required during the multi-step process of plant sexual reproduction. Future functional work will help us sort out these possibilities.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Deborah J. Frank (Washington University in St. Louis, USA) for critical reading of the manuscript, Wojtek Kiwi Jaruszewski (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland) for graphic image processing (Fig. 1) and artwork (whole pistils, stigmas, ovules), and Michał Świdziński (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland) for technical assistance. This project was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland, grant No N303 023 32/1034 (to ML) and founds provided by Nicolaus Copernicus University (Toruń, Poland) for the research program of the Laboratory of Developmental Biology and Laboratory of Isotope and Instrumental Analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Ca2+ ppts

Calcium-antimonate precipitates

CRT

Calreticulin gene

CRT

Calreticulin protein

CRT PAb

Polyclonal antibody against CRT

Ecm

Extracellular matrix

GFP

Green fluorescent protein

HDEL

ER-retention sequence of plant CRT

NLS

Nuclear localization signal

NR

Nuclear reticulum

PP1

First stage of the progamic phase

PP2

Second stage of the progamic phase

PP3

Third stage of the progamic stage

PhCRT

Petunia hybrida calreticulin gene

Sitt

Stigma transmitting tract

Sytt

Style transmitting tract

UPI

Unpollinated immature pistil

UPM

Unpollinated mature pistil

References

  1. Baluška F, Šamaj J, Napier R, Volkmann D. Maize calreticulin localizes to plasmodesmata in root apex. Plant J. 1999;19:481–487. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednarska E, Lenartowska M, Niekraś L. Localization of pectins and Ca2+ ions in unpollinated and pollinated wet (Petunia hybrida Hort.) and dry (Haemanthus albiflos L.) stigma. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2005;43:249–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biggiogera M, Cisterna B, Spedito A, Vecchio L, Malatesta M. Perichromatin fibrils as early markers of transcriptional alterations. Differentiation. 2008;76:57–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borisjuk N, Sitailo L, Adler K, Malysheva L, Tewes A, Borisjuk L, Manteuffel R. Calreticulin expression in plant cells: developmental regulation, tissue specificity and intracellular distribution. Planta. 1998;206:504–514. doi: 10.1007/s004250050427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandizzi F, Hanton S, Pinto daSilva LL, Boevik P, Evans D, Oparka K, Denecke J, Hawes C. ER quality control can lead to retrograde transport from the ER lumen to the cytosol and the nucleoplasm in plants. Plant J. 2003;34:269–281. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen F, Hayes PM, Mulrooney DM, Pan A. Identification and characterization of cDNA clones encoding plant calreticulin in barley. Plant Cell. 1994;6:835–843. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.6.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen MH, Tian GW, Gafni Y, Citovsky V. Effects of calreticulin on viral cell-to-cell movement. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1866–1876. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.064386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen A, Svensson K, Thelin L, Zhang W, Tintor N, Prins D, Funke N, Michalak M, Schulze-Lefert P, Saijo Y, Sommarin M, Widell S, Persson S. Higher plant calreticulins have acquired specialized functions in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coughlan SJ, Hastings C, Winfrey RW., Jr Cloning and characterization of the calreticulin gene from Ricinus communis L. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;34:897–911. doi: 10.1023/A:1005822327479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dedhar S. Novel functions for calreticulin: interactions with integrins and modulation gene expression. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994;19:269–271. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Denecke J, Carlsson LE, Vidal S, Höglund AS, Ek B, van Zeijl MJ, Sinjorgo KM, Palva ET. The tobacco homolog of mammalian calreticulin is present in protein complexes in vivo. Plant Cell. 1995;7:391–406. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.4.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dresselhaus T, Franklin-Tong N. Male-female crosstalk during pollen germination, tube growth and guidance, and double fertilization. Mol Plant. 2013;6:1018–1036. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dresselhaus T, Hagel C, Lorz H, Kranz E. Isolation of a full length cDNA encoding calreticulin from a PCR library of in vitro zygotes of maize. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;31:23–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00020603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu Y, Yuan M, Huang BQ, Yang HY, Zee SY, O’Brien TP. Changes in actin organization in the living egg apparatus of Torenia fournieri during fertilization. Sex Plant Reprod. 2000;12:315–322. doi: 10.1007/s004970000026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ge LL, Tian HQ, Russell SD. Calcium function and distribution during fertilization in angiosperms. Am J Bot. 2007;94:1046–1060. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.6.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gelebart P, Opas M, Michalak M. Calreticulin, a Ca2+-binding chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gomes DA, Leite MF, Bennett AM, Nathanson MH. Calcium signaling in the nucleus. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006;84:325–332. doi: 10.1139/y05-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hassan AM, Wesson C, Trumble WR. Calreticulin is the major Ca2+-storage protein in the endoplasmic reticulum of the pea plant (Pisum sativum) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;211:54–59. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hepler PK, Kunkel JG, Rounds CM, Winship LJ. Calcium entry into pollen tubes. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho HC, Suarez SS. Characterization of the intracellular calcium store at the base of the sperm flagellum that regulates hyperactivated motility. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:1590–1596. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hsieh K, Huang AHC. Lipid-rich tapetosomes in Brassica tapetum are composed of oleosin-coated oil droplets and vesicles, both assembled in and then detached from the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant J. 2005;43:889–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Iwano M, Shiba H, Miwa T, Che FS, Takayama S, Nagai T, Miyawaki T, Asogai A. Ca2+ dynamics in a pollen grain and papilla cell during pollination of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:3562–3571. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iwano M, Ngo QA, Entani T, Shiba H, Nagai T, Miyawaki A, Isogai A, Grossniklaus U, Takayama S. Cytoplasmic Ca2+ changes dynamically during the interaction of the pollen tube with synergid cells. Development. 2012;139:4202–4209. doi: 10.1242/dev.081208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jia XY, Xu CY, Jing RL, Li RZ, Mao XG, Wang IP, Chang XP. Molecular cloning and characterization of wheat calreticulin (CRT) gene involved in drought-stressed responses. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:739–775. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jia XY, He LH, Jing RL, Li RZ. Calreticulin: conserved protein and diverse functions in plants. Physiol Plant. 2009;136:127–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson S, Michalak M, Opas M, Eggleton P. The ins and outs of calreticulin: from the ER lumen to the extracellular space. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:122–129. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)01926-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kobayashi S, Uciyam S, Sone T, Noda M, Lin L, Mizuno H, Matsunaga S, Fukui K. Calreticulin as a new histone binding protein in mitotic chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115:10–15. doi: 10.1159/000094795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kwiatkowski BA, Zielińska-Kwiatkowska AG, Migdalski A, Kleczkowski LA, Wasilewska LD. Cloning of two cDNAs encoding calnexin-like and calreticulin-like proteins from maize (Zea mays) leaves: identification of potential calcium-binding domains. Gene. 1995;165:219–222. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00537-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Laporte C, Vetter G, Loudes AM, Robinson DG, Hillmer S, Stussi-Garaud C, Ritzenthaler C. Involvement of the secretory pathway and the cytoskeleton in intracellular targeting and tubule assembly of Grapevine fanleaf virus movement protein in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2058–2075. doi: 10.1105/tpc.013896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lenartowska M, Bednarska E, Butowt R. Ca2+ in the pistil of Petunia hybrid Hort. during growth of the pollen tube—cytochemical and radiographic studies. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot. 1997;39:79–89. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lenartowska M, Karaś K, Marshall J, Napier R, Bednarska E. Immunocytochemical evidence of calreticulin-like protein in pollen tubes and styles of Petunia hybrida Hort. Protoplasma. 2002;219:23–30. doi: 10.1007/s007090200002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lenartowska M, Lenartowski R, Smoliński DJ, Wróbel B, Niedojadło J, Jaworski K, Bednarska E. Calreticulin expression and localization in plant cells during pollen-pistil interactions. Planta. 2009;231:67–77. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lenartowski R, Suwińska A, Prusińska J, Gumowski K, Lenartowska M. Molecular cloning and transcriptional activity of a new Petunia calreticulin gene involved in pistil transmitting tract maturation, progamic phase, and double fertilization. Planta. 2014;239:437–454. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1971-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Z, Komatsu S. Molecular cloning and characterization of calreticulin, a calcium-binding protein involved in regeneration of rice cultured suspension cells. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:737–745. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li HJ, Xue Y, Jia DJ, Wang T, Hi DQ, Liu J, Cui F, Xie Q, Ye D, Yang WC. POD1 regulates pollen tube guidance in response to micropylar female signaling and acts in early embryo patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3288–3302. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.088914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim CO, Kim HY, Kim MG, Lee SI, Chung SI, Park SH, Hwang I, Cho MJ. Expressed sequence tags of Chinese cabbage flower bud cDNA. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:577–588. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.2.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mazars C, Brière C, Bourque S, Thuleau P. Nuclear calcium signaling: an emerging topic in plants. Biochimie. 2011;93:2068–2074. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Menegazzi P, Guzzo F, Baldan B, Mariani P, Treves S. Purification of calreticulin-like protein(s) from spinach leaves. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;190:1130–1135. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Michalak M, Milner RE, Burns K, Opas M. Calreticulin. Biochem J. 1992;285:681–692. doi: 10.1042/bj2850681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Michalak M, Groenedyk J, Szabo E, Gold LI, Opas M. Calreticulin, a multi-process calcium-buffering chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulin. Biochem J. 2009;417:651–666. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Naaby-Hansen S, Wolkowicz MJ, Klotz K, Bush LA, Westbrook VA, Shibahara H, Shetty J, Coonrod SA, Reddi PP, Shannon J, Kinter M, Sherman NE, Fox J, Flickinger CJ, Herr JC. Colocalization of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor and calreticulin in the equatorial segment and in membrane bounded vesicles in the cytoplasmic droplet of human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7:923–933. doi: 10.1093/molehr/7.10.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nakamura M, Moriya M, Baba T, Michikawa Y, Yamanobe T, Arai K, Okinaga S, Kobayashi T. An endoplasmic reticulum protein, calreticulin, is transported into acrosome of rat sperm. Exp Cell Res. 1993;205:101–110. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Napier RM, Trueman S, Henderson J, Boyce JM, Hawes C, Fricker MD, Venis MA. Purification, sequencing and functions of calreticulin from maize. J Exp Bot. 1995;46:1603–1613. doi: 10.1093/jxb/46.10.1603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nardi MC, Giacomelli E, Dainese P, Fitchette-Laine AC, Fave L, Baldan B, Navazio L, Mariani P. Ginkgo biloba express calreticulin, the major calcium-binding reticuloplasmin in eukaryotic cells. Bot Acta. 1998;11:66–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1998.tb00679.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nardi CN, Feron R, Navazio L, Mariani P, Pierson E, Wolters-Arts M, Knuiman B, Mariani C, Derksen J. Expression and localization of calreticulin in tobacco anthers and pollen tubes. Planta. 2006;223:1263–1271. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0175-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Navazio L, Sponga L, Dainese P, Fitchette-Laine AC, Faye L, Baldan B, Mariani P. The calcium binding protein calreticulin in pollen of Liriodendron tulipifera L.) Plant Sci. 1998;131:35–42. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00233-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Navazio L, Miuzzo M, Royle L, Baldan B, Varotto S, Merry AH, Harvey DJ, Dwek RA, Ruud PM, Mariani P. Monitoring endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi traffic of a plant calreticulin by protein glycosylation analysis. Biochemistry. 2002;41:14141–14149. doi: 10.1021/bi0204701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nelson DE, Glaunsinger B, Bohnert HJ. Abundant accumulation of the calcium-binding molecular chaperone calreticulin in specific floral tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1997;114:29–37. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Opas M, Tharin S, Milner RE, Michalak M. Identification and localization of calreticulin in plant cells. Protoplasma. 1996;191:164–171. doi: 10.1007/BF01281814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Persson S, Rosenquist M, Sommarin M. Identification of a novel calreticulin isoform (Crt2) in human and mouse. Gene. 2002;297:151–158. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00880-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Popłońska K. Occurrence of calreticulin during the exchange of nucleohistones into protamine-type proteins in Chara vulgaris spermiogenesis. Protoplasma. 2013;250:43–51. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0370-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Qin Y, Leydon AR, Manzielo A, Pandey R, Mount D, Denic S, Vasic B, Johnson MA, Palanivelu R. Penetration of the stigma and style elicist a novel transcriptome in pollen tubes, pointing to genes critical for growth in a pistil. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Qiu Y, Xi J, Du L, Poovaiah BW. The function of calreticulin in plant immunity. New discoveries for an old protein. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7:907–910. doi: 10.4161/psb.20721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Qiu Y, Xi J, Du L, Roje S, Poovaiah BW. A dual regulatory role of Arabidopsis calreticulin-2 in plant innate immunity. Plant J. 2012;69:489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ranty B, Cotelle V, Galaud JP, Mazars C. Nuclear calcium signaling and its involvement in transcriptional regulation in plants. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;740:1123–1143. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2888-2_51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Šamaj J, Salaj J, Obert B, Baluška F, Menzel D, Volkmann D. Calreticulin mRNA and protein are localized to protein bodies in storage maize callus cells. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:231–239. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0447-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sharma A, Isogai M, Yamamoto T, Sagaguchi K, Hashimoto J, Komatsu S. A novel interaction between calreticulin and ubiquitin nuclear protein in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:684–692. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shaw PJ, Brown JW. Plant nuclear bodies. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7:614–620. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shaw PJ, Brown JW. Nucleoli: composition, function, and dynamics. Plant Physiol. 2011;158:44–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.188052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Souto-Padrón T, Labriola CA, de Souza W. Immunocytochemical localisation of calreticulin in Trypanosoma cruzi. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004;122:563–569. doi: 10.1007/s00418-004-0724-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Steinhorst L, Kudla J. Calcium—a central regulator of pollen germination and tube growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:1573–1581. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Strick R, Strissel PL, Gavrilov K, Levi-Setti R. Cation-chromatin binding as shown by ion microscopy is essential for the structural integrity of chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:899–910. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Thelin L, Mutwil M, Sommarin M, Persson S. Diverging functions among calreticulin isoforms in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6:905–910. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.6.15339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Torres E, Gonzalez-Melendi P, Stöger E, Shaw P, Twyman RM, Nicholson L, Vaquero C, Fischer R, Christou P, Perrin Y. Native and artificial reticuloplasmins co-accumulate in distinct domains of the endoplasmic reticulum and in post-endoplasmic reticulum compartments. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1212–1223. doi: 10.1104/pp.010260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vandecaetsbeek I, Vangheluwe P, Raeymaekers L, Wuytack F, Vanoevelen J. The Ca2+ pumps of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a004184. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams CM, Zhang G, Cass DD. Characterization of calcium uptake in isolated maize sperm cells. J Plant Physiol. 1997;150:560–566. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80319-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Williams CM, Zhang GC, Michalak M, Cass DD. Calcium induced protein phosphorylation and changes in levels of calmodulin and calreticulin in maize sperm cells. Sex Plant Reprod. 1997;10:83–88. doi: 10.1007/s004970050071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ye XL, Yeung EC, Zee SY. Sperm movement during fertilization of a flowering plant, Phaius tankervilliae. Planta. 2002;215:60–66. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0736-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Planta are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES