Table 1.
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Mean | SD | ICCb/w |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Within-person variables | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
1. Agentic Behavior | 1 | 13.13 | 35.33 | 0.06 | |||||||
2. Communal Behavior | −.03* | 1 | 28.88 | 35.24 | 0.11 | ||||||
3. Relative Agentic Perception | .04* | .07* | 1 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 0.15 | |||||
4. Relative Communal Perception | .07* | .23* | .28* | 1 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 0.15 | ||||
| |||||||||||
Between-person variables | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
5. Overall Agentic Perception | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1.72 | 0.71 | -- | |||
6. Overall Communal Perception | -- | -- | -- | -- | .37* | 1 | 2.06 | 0.73 | -- | ||
7. Narcissistic Grandiosity | -- | -- | -- | -- | −.07 | −.03 | 1 | 2.86 | 0.67 | -- | |
8. Narcissistic Vulnerability | -- | -- | -- | -- | .04 | −.17* | .42* | 1 | 2.17 | 0.76 | -- |
Note. Within-person n=7553. Between-person n=184. Agentic and communal behavior scores were calculated as noted in the method section, by first ipsatizing behavior scores within each interaction, then subtracting opposing poles (Dominance – Submissive= Agentic Behavior; Warmth – Coldness = Communal Behavior). Relative agentic and communal perceptions were calculated consistent with the method section, by subtracting the participant’s average score from each event score (e.g. person centered). Overall agentic and communal perceptions refer to the average level of perception for each individual. We replicated the within-person correlations after removing the between-person component, and found that the correlations remained the same (to 2 decimal places of precision). SD= Standard Deviation. ICCb/w= Intraclass correlation coefficient, representing proportion of total variance attributed to between-person differences (versus within person differences). The ICCb/w was calculated by fitting an unconditional means model and dividing the between person variance from the total variance (sum of the between person variance and residual).
p<.05.