Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.005

Table 3. Use of MCS While Listed for HTx Compared Between the 2 Eras.

Region
Era 1/Era 2 (n)
LVAD at HTx p Value RVAD at HTx p Value BiVAD at HTx p Value



Era 1 Era 2 Era 1 Era 2 Era 1 Era 2
Region 1 (316/427) 18.4% (58) 30.9% (132) <0.001 0.6% (2) 0.0% (0) 0.100 6.6% (21) 7.0% (30) 0.839
Region 2 (1,077/1,475) 14.1% (152) 24.0% (354) <0.001 0.7% (8) 0.5% (8) 0.526 2.7% (29) 3.4% (50) 0.315
Region 3 (1,010/1,273) 6.8% (69) 19.6% (250) <0.001 0.1% (1) 0.1% (1) 0.870 2.0% (20) 1.5% (19) 0.372
Region 4 (819/964) 6.6% (54) 22.3% (215) <0.001 0.2% (2) 0.0% (0) 0.125 1.2% (10) 0.7% (7) 0.284
Region 5 (1,264/1,567) 4.4% (56) 15.5% (243) <0.001 0.3% (4) 0.3% (4) 0.760 2.5% (31) 6.5% (102) <0.001
Region 6 (284/278) 13.0% (37) 46.8% (130) <0.001 0.0% (0) 0.7% (2) 0.152 3.5% (10) 2.9% (8) 0.665
Region 7 (860/939) 14.1% (121) 43.2% (406) <0.001 0.1% (1) 0.2% (2) 0.616 1.6% (14) 2.8% (26) 0.101
Region 8 (406/616) 12.3% (50) 24.2% (149) <0.001 0.0% (0) 0.3% (2) 0.250 0.5% (2) 2.6% (16) 0.012
Region 9 (752/638) 13.0% (98) 33.5% (214) <0.001 0.0% (0) 0.5% (3) 0.060 3.1% (23) 6.3% (40) 0.004
Region 10 (845/832) 16.2% (137) 36.9% (307) <0.001 0.5% (4) 0.1% (1) 0.184 1.5% (13) 4.0% (33) 0.002
Region 11 (945/1,129) 12.6% (119) 26.3% (297) <0.001 0.1% (1) 0.2% (2) 0.670 1.8% (17) 2.5% (28) 0.289
All (8,578/10,138)* 11.1% (951) 26.6% (2697) <0.001 0.3% (23) 0.2% (25) 0.771 2.2% (190) 3.5% (359) <0.001

Region
Era 1/Era 2 (n)
TAH at HTx p Value MCS all at HTx p Value


Era 1 Era 2 Era 1 Era 2

Region 1 (316/427) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) NA 25.6% (81) 37.9% (162) <0.001
Region 2 (1,077/1,475) 0.0% (0) 0.7% (10) 0.007 17.5% (189) 28.6% (422) <0.001
Region 3 (1,010/1,273) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) NA 8.9% (90) 21.2% (270) <0.001
Region 4 (819/964) 0.0% (0) 0.5% (5) 0.039 8.1% (66) 23.5% (227) <0.001
Region 5 (1,264/1,567) 0.7% (9) 2.2% (35) 0.001 7.9% (100) 24.5% (384) <0.001
Region 6 (284/278) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) NA 16.5% (47) 50.4% (140) <0.001
Region 7 (860/939) 0.1% (1) 0.3% (3) 0.361 15.9% (137) 46.4% (436) <0.001
Region 8 (406/616) 0.0% (0) 0.2% (1) 0.417 12.8% (52) 27.3% (168) <0.001
Region 9 (752/638) 0.0% (0) 0.2% (1) 0.277 16.1% (121) 40.4% (258) <0.001
Region 10 (845/832) 0.5% (4) 1.7% (14) 0.016 18.7% (158) 42.6% (355) <0.001
Region 11 (945/1,129) 0.1% (1) 4.1% (46) <0.001 14.6% (138) 33.0% (373) <0.001
All (8,578/10,139)* 0.2% (15) 1.1% (115) <0.001 13.7% (1179) 31.5% (3195) <0.001

Use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) while listed for heart transplantation (HTx) compared between the 2 eras (percent of patients and absolute numbers listed; Era 1: January 20, 1999 to July 11, 2006; Era 2: July 12, 2006 to April 30, 2012).

*

Data of 4,674 patients in Era 1 and that of 1 patient in Era 2 not obtained.

BiVAD = bi-ventricular assist device; LVAD = left ventricular assist device; RVAD = right ventricular assist device; TAH = total artificial heart.