TABLE 4.
Multinomial Regression Models Estimating the Effect of Walking Speed on Self-Rated Health, Adjusted for Walking Difficulty and the Covariates in Model 1
| Excellent Vs. Good |
Good Vs. Fair |
Good Vs. Poor/Bad |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Model 3a | ||||||
| Normal walking speeda | 1.33* | 1.01–1.76 | 0.78* | 0.61–0.99 | 0.66** | 0.47–0.89 |
| Walking difficulty | ||||||
| Not at all | 2.72 | 0.70–10.55 | 0.33* | 0.11–0.96 | 0.12 | 0.01–1.04 |
| Yes (ref) | ||||||
| Model 3b | ||||||
| Fast walking speeda | 0.99 | 0.95–1.04 | 0.93 | 0.80–1.08 | 0.80* | 0.66–0.97 |
| Walking difficulty | ||||||
| Not at all | 2.94 | 0.75–11.52 | 0.28* | 0.09–0.81 | 0.12 | 0.01–1.07 |
| Yes (ref) | ||||||
Note: Reference category for self-rated health is “good.” OR = odds ratio.
p <.05
p < .01.
In this analysis walking speeds were multiplied by 10; therefore, these ORs represent the factors by which the odds of the SRH outcome increases for each 0.1m/s increment in walking speed, after adjusting for the effects of the other covariates in the regression model.