Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gerontol. 2013 Jan;36(1):17–32. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2012.731477

TABLE 4.

Multinomial Regression Models Estimating the Effect of Walking Speed on Self-Rated Health, Adjusted for Walking Difficulty and the Covariates in Model 1

Excellent Vs. Good
Good Vs. Fair
Good Vs. Poor/Bad
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Model 3a
    Normal walking speeda 1.33* 1.01–1.76 0.78* 0.61–0.99 0.66** 0.47–0.89
Walking difficulty
    Not at all 2.72 0.70–10.55 0.33* 0.11–0.96 0.12 0.01–1.04
    Yes (ref)
Model 3b
    Fast walking speeda 0.99 0.95–1.04 0.93 0.80–1.08 0.80* 0.66–0.97
Walking difficulty
    Not at all 2.94 0.75–11.52 0.28* 0.09–0.81 0.12 0.01–1.07
    Yes (ref)

Note: Reference category for self-rated health is “good.” OR = odds ratio.

*

p <.05

**

p < .01.

a

In this analysis walking speeds were multiplied by 10; therefore, these ORs represent the factors by which the odds of the SRH outcome increases for each 0.1m/s increment in walking speed, after adjusting for the effects of the other covariates in the regression model.