Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 21;2014:456979. doi: 10.1155/2014/456979

Table 3.

Comparison of the effect of fluoroquinolone resistance selection on the MIC of various antimicrobial agents and ethidium bromide. Ethidium bromide concentrations in the plates were 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 µg/mL.

C.  perfringens strains MIC (µg/mL), as shown by Etest for antimicrobial agents or agar dilution for ethidium bromide
Erythromycin Amoxicillin Ceftriaxone Gentamicin Chloramphenicol Cefoxitin Metronidazole Ethidium bromide
3626
 W 2 0.1 1 128 3 1 1.5 6
 NR 1.5 0.19∗a 0.016 48 8* 0.25 3* 10∗∗b
 CR 0.5 0.1 4* 12 2 1 1.5 10**
 GR 1 0.25* 0.016 64 6* 2* 3* 5
13124
 W 2 0.25 64 512 8 4 3 4
 NR 0.75 0.125 16 64 3 1.5 1.5 2
 CR 1.5 0.75* 32 128 8 2 4* 4
 GR 1 2* 12 256 3 4 1.5 2
NCTR
 W 2 0.13 4 128 4 0.38 1.5 2
 NR 0.75 0.2 0.016 128 3 0.75* 0.75 10**
 CR 1 0.2 3 48 4 0.5 1 10**
 GR 0.75 0.1 1 32 3 1* 1.5 10**
VPI
 W 1.5 0.25 16 384 3 0.75 3 6
 NR 3 0.38 16 64 4 1.5* 3 8**
 CR 1.5 1.5* 16 256 3 3* 2 10**
 GR 0.75 0.5* 64* 256 6* 2* 3 8**

aThe ∗ indicates that fluoroquinolone resistance selection resulted in a decrease in susceptibility; W, NR, CR, and GR refer to wild type, norfloxacin-resistant, ciprofloxacin-resistant, and gatifloxacin-resistant, respectively. b∗∗Resistant strains grew on the plates containing 10 µg/mL of ethidium bromide, so the MIC of the ethidium bromide was greater than 10 µg/mL for these strains.