Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2014 Nov 1;48(1):113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.031

Table 3.

Material parameters estimated by fitting the microstructurally motivated constitutive relation (Appendix 1) to average datasets (excluding outliers) for the ascending thoracic aorta (ATA) and proximal descending thoracic aorta (DTA) from untreated wild-type (uWT), treated wild-type (tWT), untreated R247C mutant (uR247C), and treated R247C mutant (tR247C) mice. RMSE denotes the root mean sum-of-the-squares of the error for the regression. Although individual parameters can be compared across groups, better interpretations come from resulting values of the linearized stiffness and stored energy (cf. Figures 3 and 5).

c
(kPa)
c11
(kPa)
c21
(−)
c12
(kPa)
c22
(−)
c13,4
(kPa)
c23,4
(−)
α0
(deg)
RSME
(−)
ATA
uWT 32.38 12.67 0.04 15.00 0.24 4.57 0.50 42.08 0.060
tWT 29.06 9.54 0.10 14.40 0.47 3.50 0.82 41.76 0.053
uR247C 20.01 6.62 0.12 16.02 0.16 3.70 0.40 41.31 0.064
tR247C 26.10 6.89 0.19 20.94 0.26 5.69 0.63 41.25 0.058
DTA
uWT 45.17 0.65 1.60 13.14 0.64 0.20 2.50 30.75 0.061
tWT 33.73 2.96 1.26 14.04 0.48 0.27 2.53 28.57 0.054
uR247C 36.19 4.66 0.34 23.21 0.25 0.27 2.26 26.85 0.087
tR247C 28.25 2.11 0.99 18.18 0.36 1.12 1.46 25.52 0.078