Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov 14;99(1):360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.061

Table 1.

LVAD bridge to recovery studies (adapted from [12]).

Study Design N Standardized
Med Therapy
Duration
(mos)
Recovery*
n (%)
Durability**
LVAD Working Group, 2007 [45] P 67 N 4.5 6 (9) 100/6m
Berlin, 2008 and 2011 [46, 47] P 188 N 4 35 (19) 74/3y; 66/5y
Harefield, 2006 [6] P 15 Y 11 11 (73) 100/1y; 89/4y
Harefield, 2011 [5] P 20 Y 9 12 (60) 88/3y
Athens-Harefield, 2007 [48] P 8 Y 7 4 (50) 100/2y
Vancouver, 2011 [49] P 17 N 7 4 (23) 100/2y
Gothenburg, 2007 [50] P 18 N 7 3 (17) 33/8y
Pittsburgh, 2003 [51] R 18 N 8 6 (33) 67/1y
Osaka, 2005 [52] R 11 N 15 5 (45) 100/8–29m
Pittsburgh, 2010 [53] R 102 N/A 5 14 (14) 71/5y
Multicenter, 2002 [54] R 271 N/A 2 22 (8) 77/3y
Columbia, 1998 [55] R 111 N/A 6 5 (4.5) 20/15m
Montefiore, 2013 [20] P 21 Y ? 5 (23%) 100/>3y

P, prospective; R, retrospective; NA, not applicable; HF, heart failure.

*

Recovery defined as LVAD explantation as a result of functional myocardial recovery.

**

Durability defined as freedom from LVAD reimplantation or transplant - percentage over mean years of follow-up.