Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gerontology. 2014 Oct 22;61(1):3–14. doi: 10.1159/000363442

Table 5.

Mean (SD) and pre- and post-EA comparison of subjective evaluations and UPDRS parameters for intervention and control group. The symbol * (grey cells) indicates a significant difference.

Parameter Intervention
Control
Pre-EA Post-EA Difference 95% CI p-value Pre-EA Post-EA Difference 95% CI p-value
SF-12 (PCS) 39.7 (11.7) 40.3 (14.1) 1% ↑ −11.6 12.8 0.82 34.7 (9.4) 33.7 (5.3) 3% ↓ −12.6 10.7 0.85
SF-12 (MCS) 43.4 (12.6) 47.1 (8.5) 8% ↑ −6.5 13.9 0.45 47.2 (7.3) 47.7 (7.9) 1% ↑ −10.7 11.6 0.93
Short FES-I 17.2 (6.8) 14.6 (6.9) 15% ↓ −9.0 3.8 0.41 16.6 (5.0) 18.4 (4.0) 11% ↑ −4.9 8.5 0.55
VAS 2.5 (3.2) 1.4 (2.4) 44% ↓ −3.7 1.5 0.26 3.4 (3.3) 2.2 (3.0) 35% ↓ −5.8 3.4 0.5
UPDRS-Fall 0.9 (1.3) 0.3 (0.7) 67% ↓ −1.6 0.4 0.02* 0.8 (0.8) 0.6 (0.5) 25% ↓ −1.3 0.9 0.37
UPDRS-Rigidity 6.4 (5.1) 3.3 (2.8) 48% ↓ −8.0 0.5 0.01* 7.4 (4.5) 8.2 (4.0) 11% ↑ −6.1 8.3 0.55
UPDRS I 5.3 (3.5) 2.7 (2.3) 49% ↓ −5.5 0.6 <.01* 3.3 (2.4) 5.1 (4.2) 55% ↑ −3.4 7.0 0.21
UPDRS II 18.0 (9.7) 10.8 (6.6) 46% ↓ −10.6 −3.8 <.0001* 17.0 (5.7) 16.6 (7.9) 9% ↑ −3.3 2.5 0.8
UPDRS III 35.1 (15.3) 19.1 (10.9) 40% ↓ −12.1 −19.8 <.01* 34.2 (12.3) 37.2 (11.6) 2% ↑ −1.6 7.6 0.27