Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Commun. 2011 Jun 1;61(3):432–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01555.x

Table 3.

Mediation of the association between disclosure of insights and follow-up health outcomes through follow-up breast cancer concerns

Health
self-efficacy
Emotional
well-being
Functional
well-being
Direct and total effects: Coefficients
  IV on mediator −.54*** −.48** −.48
  Mediator on DV −.24* −.32* −.39***
  Total effect of IV on DV 31 .43* .58**
  Direct effect of IV on DV .18 .27 .39*
Formal tests of the indirect effect
  Sobel: z value 1.90* 1.85* 2.23*
  Bootstrapping: 95% CI .015 – .353 .031 – .357 .059 – .407

Note. N = 106.

p < .06,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.

IV refers to disclosure of insights; mediator is breast cancer concerns at follow-up; DV refers to each of the health outcomes (health self-efficacy, emotional well-being, and functional well-being) assessed at follow-up. Individual background characteristics and baseline variable were also entered in the analyses as covariates. The significance of Sobel z value was tested with one-tailed p values.