Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Oct 10;15(11):736–747. doi: 10.1038/nrm3888

Figure 3. Checkpoint protein regions and interactions.

Figure 3

Figure 3

(A) Interacting regions of kinetochore and checkpoint proteins are depicted. Lines between regions indicate established interactions, and phosphoregulated interactions are shown in red. BubR1/Mad3 domains vary by organism with the pseudokinase domain absent from some lineages57. Structures have been determined for interactions of Bub1-Bub3 and BubR1/Mad3-Bub358, Bub1/3-Knl151, BubR1/Mad3-Knl172, BubR1/Mad3-Mad232,148 and Mad1/2149. MELT-like repeats exhibit poor sequence-level conservation and repeat numbers vary from 2 in some fungi and plants to 27 in Xenopus tropicalis57,70. Note that a single MELT-like motif interacts with three WD40 domains51. C-helix, RLK, CD1, and Bub3-binding regions are all required for the checkpoint. RLK: A Mad1 motif required for Bub1 association86. C-helix: the Mad1 C-terminal helix. CD1: “conserved domain 1” of Bub190,93. TPR and WD40 are common protein domains. Diagrams are oriented with N-termini on the left. (B) Hypothetical BubR1 kinetochore binding mechanisms. (i) The KI2 motif of Knl1 interacts directly with BubR1, possibly facilitating recruitment of a single BubR1 molecule47,63,70. (ii) Bub1 may also recruit BubR1, possibly through a Bub1-BubR1 interaction. Bub3 that is associated with BubR1 at the kinetochore may therefore be available for other interactions63. Bub1:BubR1 stoichiometry at the kinetochore has not been systematically analyzed.