Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;4(3):226–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.07.008

Table 3.

Accuracy Estimates from Subgroup Analysis.

Variable Subgroups (no of studies/data points) Pooled sensitivity (95% CI), % Pooled specificity (95% CI), % Positive LR (95% CI) Negative LR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) I2¥ p Valuea
All studies 27 studies/76 data points 97.1 (96.1–97.9) 99.9 (99.8–100) 118.4 (84.7–165.5) 0.032 (0.023–0.045) 4094.7 (2504.1–6600.8) 66%
Abstracts excluded 25 full text studies/74 data points 97.1 (96.0–97.9) 99.9 (99.8–100) 126.6 (90.2–177.8) 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 4327.2 (2753.2–6800.9) 66%
Year Prior 2005 (12/25) 97.1 (95.2–98.2) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 93.4 (56.8–153.6) 0.023 (0.012–0.044) 5931.9 (2393.4–14703.4) 74% Reference
After 2005 (15/51) 95.4 (91.1–97.5) 99.3 (98.9–99.5) 129.1 (84.4–196.1) 0.038 (0.029–0.050) 3501.5 (2016.6–6079.2) 59% 0.39
Location of Testb Developing Countries (20/39) 94.3 (89.8–96.4) 99.1 (98.4–99.5) 72.2 (48.4–109.3) 0.049 (0.032–0.077) 1467.7 (762.8–2824.1) 69% Reference
Developed Countries (6/36) 97.0 (96.2–97.7) 99.4 (99.0–99.6) 193.5 (115.8–323.6) 0.018 (0.012–0.036) 9812.7 (6467.3.0–14888.7) 0% <0.001
Reference Test EIA/ELISA/MEIA alone (21/34) 94.1 (90.6–96.3) 98.9 (98.4–99.3) 82.9 (55.5–123.7) 0.060 (0.037–0.098) 1663.7 (745.3–3714.0) 76% Reference
Neutralization/NAT test (6/42) 97.0 (96.4–97.5) 99.5 (99.1–99.7) 185.5 (104.5–329.2) 0.018 (0.014–0.023) 7179.6 (4901.5–10497.3) 0% <0.001
Study design Cross sectional (13/18) 95.4 (93.3–96.8) 99.3 (98.8–99.8) 129.9 (84.9–196.7) 0.078 (0.043–0.140) 3111.7 (984.6–9833.7) 81% Reference
Case control (14/58) 97.1 (95.2–98.2) 99.0 (98.4–99.4) 93.9 (56.4–153.2) 0.021 (0.016–0.026) 4373.0 (2656.9–7197.7) 54% 0.63
Source of serac Hospital/Clinics (13/23) 96.2 (94.0–97.6) 99.5 (99.1–99.7) 188.0 (103.1–344.0) 0.027 (0.014–0.60) 7052.4 (3063.5–16238.3) 64% Reference
Blood Banks (7/36) 97.1 (95.9–97.9) 99.4 (99.0–99.6) 157.2 (94.9–260.4) 0.015 (0.012–0.020) 9974.1 (5115.8–12429.4) 0% 0.36
CRS¥ No CRS¥ (23/70) 95.9 (94.4–97.1) 99.1 (98.8–99.4) 107.6 (76.6–151.2) 0.033 (0.024–0.047) 3619.5 (2217–5908.4) 66% Reference
HIV Clinics with CRS¥ (4/6) 96.2 (93.1–97.9) 99.8 (99.4–99.9) 493.6 (1594.7-1527.9) 0.019 (0.006–0.059) 24709.4 (6264.0–97467.0) 0% 0.18
Score ≤15 (19/39) 93.7 (89.9–96.2) 99.0 (98.5–99.4) 91.5 (58.6–142.8) 0.053 (0.035–0.081) 1838.4 (915.8–3690.2) 74% Reference
>15 (6/35) 97.0 (96.5–97.5) 99.5 (99.1–99.7) 185.2 (107.8–318.3) 0.012 (0.009–0.016) 10414.9 (6464.8–16778.6) 0% <0.001

LR = Likelihood ratio, DOR = Diagnostic Odds Ratio, I2¥ = inconsistency index test for heterogeneity (<25 = low, >25–50% = moderate; >50–75% = substantial & >75% = considerable statistical heterogeneity), CRS¥ = cross reactive sera.

a

p Value determined from meta-regression model.

b

Location of one study (Reference 29) not known.

c

Source of sera of 7 studies (Ref 20, 22, 29, 30, 34, 40, 41) not known.