Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):94–101. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.94

Table 1.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiation therapy vs transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Ref. Year Country Patient number TACE + RT vs TACE Child-Pugh (CP-A:CP-B) Tumor thrombus Tumor size Response rate Over all survival
Koo et al[22] 2010 South Korea 42 vs 29 26:16 vs 17:12 All patients had inferior vena cava tumor thrombus 10 ± 4.0 vs 12 ±3.8 cm 42.9% vs 13.8% 1 yr OS 47.7% vs 17.2%
Zhang et al[24] 2009 China 16 vs 29 13:3 19:10 Stenosis: occlusion < 10 cm : ≥ 10 cm N/A 1 yr OS 32.5% vs 6.9%
14:2 vs 21:9 13:3 vs 21:8
Shim et al[25] 2005 South Korea 38 vs 35 33:5 vs 32:3 yes: no 10.2 vs 9.5cm 65.8% vs N/A 2 yr OS 36.8% vs 14.3%
12:26 vs 10:25
Zeng et al[20] 2004 China 54 vs 149 Non 76% vs 31% 1 yr OS 71.5% vs 59.6%

TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; RT: Radiation therapy; OS: Overall survival.