Table 1.
Ref. | Year | Country | Patient number TACE + RT vs TACE | Child-Pugh (CP-A:CP-B) | Tumor thrombus | Tumor size | Response rate | Over all survival |
Koo et al[22] | 2010 | South Korea | 42 vs 29 | 26:16 vs 17:12 | All patients had inferior vena cava tumor thrombus | 10 ± 4.0 vs 12 ±3.8 cm | 42.9% vs 13.8% | 1 yr OS 47.7% vs 17.2% |
Zhang et al[24] | 2009 | China | 16 vs 29 | 13:3 19:10 | Stenosis: occlusion | < 10 cm : ≥ 10 cm | N/A | 1 yr OS 32.5% vs 6.9% |
14:2 vs 21:9 | 13:3 vs 21:8 | |||||||
Shim et al[25] | 2005 | South Korea | 38 vs 35 | 33:5 vs 32:3 | yes: no | 10.2 vs 9.5cm | 65.8% vs N/A | 2 yr OS 36.8% vs 14.3% |
12:26 vs 10:25 | ||||||||
Zeng et al[20] | 2004 | China | 54 vs 149 | Non | 76% vs 31% | 1 yr OS 71.5% vs 59.6% |
TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; RT: Radiation therapy; OS: Overall survival.