Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;3(3):60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2014.04.002

Table 3.

Clinical significance of neostigmine for ACPO.

Author
Experimental group
Control group


Year Event Total Event Total NNT 95% CI
Clinical response
Orlando 1994 17 20 9 20 3 1 8
Ponec 1999 10 11 0 10 1 1 2
von der Spoel 2001 11 13 0 11 1 1 2
Fanaei 2008 20 21 0 21 2 1 2
Total 58 65 9 62 1 1 2
Abdominal pain
Ponec 1999 8 11 0 10 1 1 2
Fanaei 2008 9 21 0 21 2 2 5
Total 17 32 0 31 2 1 3
Sialorrhoea
Ponec 1999 3 11 0 10 4 2 12
von der Spoel 2001 3 13 0 11 5 2 22
Fanaei 2008 8 21 0 21 3 2 8
Total 14 45 0 62 3 2 6
Vomiting
Ponec 1999 1 11 0 10 13 3 5
Fanaei 2008 4 21 0 21 6 3 54
Total 5 32 0 31 7 3 375
Bradycardia
Ponec 1999 1 11 0 10 13 3 5
Fanaei 2008 1 21 0 21 23 4 9
Total 2 32 0 31 16 6 25

NNT=Number needed to treat; NNH=Number needed to harm.