Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 12;111(52):18454–18459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417923111

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Comparison of the energy required to share a proton between residues (ΔEν=0) as a function of the hydrogen-bond donor–acceptor O–O distance (ROO) compared with the ZPE. (A) ΔEν=0 as a function of the O–O distance (ROO) between O16 and O57 using the tyrosine triad geometry from a crystal structure (details in SI Materials and Methods, section D). A, Inset shows the probability distribution of ROO obtained from the AI-PIMD simulation of KSID40N with ionized Tyr57. The probability is normalized by the maximum value. (B) Potential energy as a function of the proton transfer coordinate ν for ROO = 2.6 Å, indicating values for H and D (O–H and O–D) ZPEs (ZPEH and ZPED, respectively). The position of Tyr32 is fixed as the proton H16 is scanned along ROO.