Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;15(12):22960–22977. doi: 10.3390/ijms151222960

Table 1.

Comparison of half-maximal inhibition concentrations (IC50) for particular cell lines, cytostatics and used assay. S.E., standard error. Differences were considered significant, when p < 0.05. * Significantly different from doxorubicin (Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing) † Significantly different from epirubicin (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing) ‡ Significantly different from lip-8-dox (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing) § Significantly different from apodox (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing) ‖ Significantly different from myocet (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing) $ Significantly different from MTT (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing).

Factor Level of Factor N IC50 (Mean ± S.E.) Significant Difference (At p < 0.05)
Cytostatic F(4, 68) = 20.49, p < 0.0001 Epirubicin 21 118.0 ± 27.2 ‡, §, ‖
Doxorubicin 18 268.9 ± 43.6 §, ‖
Apodox 22 1095.0 ± 163.8 *, †, ‖
Lip-8 16 1014.5 ± 209.8 †, ‖
Myocet 21 1915.4 ± 417.3 *, †, ‡, §
Cell line F(2, 68) = 0.46, p = 0.47 PNT1A 36 936.3 ± 167.9
22RV1 32 834.5 ± 161.5
LNCaP 30 915.1 ± 299.6
Method F(1, 68) = 6.48, p < 0.013 MTT 31 1200.1 ± 316.1
RTCA 67 756.1 ± 98.1 $