Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Obes. 2013 Jul 17;9(5):373–380. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00189.x

Table 1.

Subject characteristics by obesity phenotype

Characteristic All
N=47
Lean
N=10
Obese
N=12
T2D
N=25
p-value
Male 17 (36%) 5 (50%) 4 (33%) 8 (32%) 0.66
Age 15.3 (2.1) 14.9 (2.0) 15.1 (2.0) 15.6 (2.3) 0.63
Ethnicity
Caucasian 19 (40%) 8 (80%) 6 (50%) 5 (20%)
Hispanic 22 (47%) 1 (10%) 5 (42%) 16 (64%) 0.01
Other 6 (13%) 1 (10%) 1 (8%) 4 (16%)
Tanner*,
2 1 (2%) 0 0 1 (4%)
3 4 (9%) 1 (10%) 1 (8.3%) 2 (8%) 0.02
4 7 (15%) 5 (50%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (4%)
5 34 (74%) 4 (40%) 10 (83.3%) 20 (83%)
BMI z-score 1.6 (1.0) −0.06 (0.71) 1.9 (0.46)a 2.1 (0.48)a <0.0001
% Fat Mass 36.6 (12.1) 19.0 (10.6) 39.6 (6.8)a 42.4 (6.9)a <0.0001
GIR (mg/kg*min−1) 7.6 (5.3) 15.2 (4.4) 8.0 (2.8)a 4.3 (2.4)a,b <0.0001
Lean GIR (mg/lean kg*min−1) 12.2 (6.3) 19.8 (4.3) 14.0 (4.5)a 7.9 (3.9)a,b <0.0001
SBP (mmHg) 119 (11.0) 111 (6.2) 121 (8.9)a 122 (11.7)a 0.01
DBP (mmHg) 71.5 (9.2) 62.7 (6.4) 74.6 (7.1)a 73.5 (9.2)a 0.002
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.8(1.1) 1.0 (0.4) 1.9(1.2) 2.0(1.2) 0.07
HDL (mmol/L) 1.1 (0.3) 1.2 (0.2) 1.1 (0.3) 1.06 (0.3) 0.49
LDL (mmol/L) 2.3 (0.6) 1.8 (0.5) 2.63 (0.65)a 2.39 (0.6)a 0.009
Log (ALT) 3.6 (0.72) 3.5 (0.50) 3.6 (0.41) 3.7 (0.90) 0.66
IL6 (pg/ml)* 3.4 (3.0) 2.5 (1.1) 2.4 (0.85) 4.3 (3.9) 0.13
hsCRP (nmol/L) 35.2 (42.9) 7.5 (9.1) 10.5(15.2) 58.1 (47.6)a,b 0.0002
Adiponectin (μg/ml) 8.0 (3.8) 9.5 (3.3) 10.2 (3.7) 6.3 (3.2)a,b 0.002
Baseline Glucose (mmol/L) 5.6 (1.6) 4.6 (0.3) 4.7 (0.4) 6.5 (1.8)a,b 0.0001
Baseline NEFA (μmol/L) 558 (254) 521 (317) 583 (155) 561 (273) 0.86
NEFA Suppression (%) 74 (27) 90 (7) 68 (36) 70 (26) 0.11
Baseline insulin (pmol/L) 160 (119) 58 (28) 113 (49)a 223 (126)a,b <0.0001

Datarepresent Mean (SD) or N (%). Tanner stage and race/ethnicity were controlled for in the phenotype comparisons of baseline NEFA and NEFA suppression.

a

significant vs. controls,

b

significant vs. obese;

*

one obese subject is missing %fat mass; several subjects are missing IL6, such that lean n=9, obese n=11, T2 n=23; *one T2D subject is missing Tanner stage;

The overall comparison among the groups is tested; pairwise comparisons are not made