Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;39(1):176–182. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.73

Table 1. Method verification measures: linearity, accuracy, precision and verification HFCS sugars fraction.

HFCS sugars fraction Method linearitya R2 Method accuracyb mean % recovery (95% CI) Method precisionc mean % recovery (RSD, %) (95% CI) Method verificationd mean % difference (95% CI)
Composite data
 Fructose 0.9998 100.77 (99.06; 102.47) 100.43 (0.85) (99.03; 101.83) 0.010 (−0.067; 0.086)
 Glucose 0.9989 101.13 (99.61; 102.64) 101.68 (0.85) (101.13; 102.23) 0.142 (0.078; 0.205)
 DP2+ 0.9987 103.33 (102.41; 104.25) 104.07 (0.85) (103.78; 104.35) −0.138 (−0.170; −0.105)
Lab 1
 Fructose 0.9999 99.40 (98.05; 100.75) 98.83 (0.49) (98.52; 99.14) −0.075 (−0.211; 0.061)
 Glucose 0.9999 100.73 (95.78; 105.67) 101.05 (0.55) (100.68; 101.42) 0.213 (0.106; 0.320)
 DP2+ 0.9995 103.06 (100.19; 105.94) 104.48 (8.20) (99.07; 109.73) −0.119 (−0.186; −0.053)
Lab 2
 Fructose 0.9998 102.13 (100.04; 104.23) 102.04 (0.50) (101.63; 102.44) 0.093 (0.027; 0.160)
 Glucose 0.9980 101.53 (99.36; 103.68) 102.31 (0.60) (101.86; 102.76) 0.070 (0.006; 0.134)
 DP2+ 0.9979 103.59 (102.08; 105.09) 103.75 (0.59) (103.30; 104.18) −0.156 (−0.159; −0.153)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RSD, relative standard deviation.

R2 is the  coefficient of determination.

a

Calculated by straight line fit of aqueous standards over a range of concentrations (80, 100 and 120% of their expected concentration in commercial beverages).

b

Calculated by the average % recovery of standards in beverage matrix over a range of concentrations (80, 100 and 120% of their expected concentration in commercial beverages); 10 replicates per concentration were performed. 95% CI: mean % recovery±1.96*s.e.

c

Calculated by the average % recovery at concentration of 100% 10 replicates.

d

Calculated by the average of the differences between actual % sugar and % sugar of the authentic standard; 10 replicates at concentration of 100%. The actual % sugar is the value reported by the lab using 10 replicates. 95% CI: average difference ±1.96*s.e.