Table 1.
Theory | Key assumptions | Level(s) of framework | Underpinning mechanisms | Authoritative references |
---|---|---|---|---|
Theory of mind | • Extra-perceptual mechanisms are required for understanding another’s mental states | • Baron-Cohen (1995) • Gopnik and Wellman (1992) |
||
• Third-person mindreading— observational rather than interactive form of understanding others | • Sub-personal • Personal |
• Inferential simulation • Theoretical inference |
• Blakemore and Decety (2001) • Goldman (2006) • Frith and Frith (2007, 2008, 2012) |
|
• Individualistic cognitive processing | • Saxe et al. (2004) | |||
Interactionism | • Mental states are directly perceivable through a person’s embodiment | • De Jaegher (2009) • De Jaegher et al. (2010) |
||
• Social cognition at the supra-individual as evolving between interactions | • Sub-personal | • Embodied intentionality | ||
• Personal • Supra-individual |
• Social affordances | • Gallagher (2008) • Gangopadhyay and Schilbach (2012) |
||
• Cognition and perception are for actively relating to the environment | ||||
Dual process theories | • Two distinct types of cognitive processes | • Type 1 cognitive processes— automatic and stimulus driven | • Evans (2008) | |
• Type 1 processes are evolutionarily older | • Sub-personal • Personal |
• Type 2 cognitive processes—controlled and flexible | • Frith and Frith (2007) • Lieberman (2007) |
|
• Type 2 processes are evolutionarily recent | ||||
Ecological psychology | • Body and environment play a constitutive role in understanding the social world | • Direct perception via dorsal visual system | • Chemero (2003) • Gibson (1979) |
|
• Perception is not inferential | • Sub-personal | • Kinematic Specific Dynamics | • McArthur and Baron (1983) • Norman (2002) |
|
• Perception and cognition serve an adaptive function providing an organism with means for direct interaction with the environment | • Personal • Supra-individual |
• Perception-action loops | • Runeson and Frykholm (1983) • Valenti and Good (1991) |
|
Enactive cognition | • Perceptions are actively brought forth through engagement with the environment | |||
• Perception is an active sense-making process that prepares an organism for action | • Sub-personal • Personal • Supra-individual |
• Participatory sense-making • Social interaction |
• De Jaegher and Di Paolo (2013) • Froese and Ziemke (2009) • Noë (2004) |
|
• Perception of invariant information relies on specific motor actions | ||||
Brunswik’s lens model | • Proximal stimuli are perceivable features of the environment | • Sub-personal | • Probabilistic functionalism | • Brunswik (1956) • Cooksey (1996) |
• Distal features are objective states of the environment, not necessarily perceivable | • Personal • Supra-individual |
• Causal ambiguity | • Doherty and Kurz (1996) • Vicente (2003) |
|
Dynamical systems | • Interactions follow dynamic laws that structure and constrain joint perception-action systems in self-organizing patterns | • Sub-personal • Personal • Supra-individual |
• Coupling of perception- action systems • Coupling of organism to environment | • Marsh et al. (2009a) • Marsh et al. (2006, 2009b) • Vallacher and Nowak (1997) |
• Dynamic laws are emergent across all size ranges of social units over varying temporal scales | • Richardson et al. (2014) |