Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 17;70(1):164–175. doi: 10.1111/jan.12183

Table 2.

Comparison of mean change after 12 months between and within the intervention group (Nurse-led rheumatology clinic) (= 47) and control group (Rheumatologist-led clinic) (= 50)

Intervention group – Control group Intervention group Control group
Mean difference of change (95% CI) P Mean change (95% CI) P Mean change (95% CI) P
DAS28 −0·06 −0·34, 0·22 0·66 0·14 −0·07, 0·34 0·19 0·20 0·00, 0·39 0·05
DAS28-CRP 0·05 −0·28, 0·19 0·70 0·14 −0·03, 0·31 0·10 0·10 −0·07, 0·26 0·24
ESR (mm/h) −1·05 −3·97, 1·86 0·47 1·09 −0·40, 2·57 0·15 2·14 −0·36, 4·64 0·09
CRP (mg/L) −1·07 −2·02, −0·12 0·03 0·13 −0·10, 0·35 0·26 1·20 0·29, 2·10 0·01
Swollen joints (28) 0·13 −2·18, 0·61 0·60 0·13 −0·27, 0·53 0·52 0·00 −0·29, 0·29 1·00
Tender joints (28) 0·33 −0·47, 1·13 0·42 0·47 −0·05, 0·99 0·08 0·14 −0·47, 0·75 0·65
VAS Global health (mm)* 4·29 −2·58, 11·16 0·22 2·49 −2·59, 7·56 0·33 −1·80 −6·57, 2·97 0·45
VAS Pain (mm)* −0·24 −7·89, 7·40 0·95 0·98 −4·74, 6·69 0·73 1·22 −4·02, 6·47 0·64
HAQ* 0·02 −0·10, 0·13 0·79 0·04 −0·04, 0·12 0·34 0·02 −0·05, 0·10 0·51
NRS Satisfaction* 0·25 −0·37, 0·88 0·43 −0·19 −0·57, 0·18 0·31 −0·44 −0·94, 0·06 0·09
NRS Confidence* 0·20 −0·29, 0·69 0·42 0·00 −0·22, 0·22 1·00 −0·20 −0·63, 0·23 0·36

Independent sample t-test for comparison between and Paired t-test for comparison within the groups.

*

Also analysed by Mann–Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed ranks test with non-significant (P > 0·05) results.

DAS, Diseases Activity Score (scale 0–10); ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; Swollen and Tender joint (28 count); VAS, Visual Analogue Scales, VAS Global health (scale 0–100 best to worse), VAS Pain (scale 0–100 best to worse); HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire (0–3 best to worse); NRS, Numerical Rating Scale, NRS Satisfaction and NRS Confidence (0–10 worse to best).