Table 1. Statistical values of fit, power and explanation of path models for the residual connectance and proportion of monophages.
| Response variables | Path models | Model fit | Statistical power* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 (p-value) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | |||
| Residual connectance | All herbivores | 6.00 (0.422) | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.004 | > 0.999 |
| Endophages | 4.17 (0.653) | 1.000 | 1.045 | < 0.001 | > 0.999 | |
| Exophages | 3.03 (0.932) | 1.000 | 1.174 | < 0.001 | 0.988 | |
| Proportion of monophages | All herbivores | 6.00 (0.422) | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.004 | > 0.999 |
| Endophages | 4.17 (0.654) | 1.000 | 1.047 | < 0.001 | > 0.999 | |
| Exophages | 3.03 (0.932) | 1.000 | 1.184 | < 0.001 | 0.982 | |
TLI: Tucker-Lewis Fit Index; CFI: Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation. Statistical power was calculated using the approach by MacCallum et al. [32].