. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun 16;26(4):1138–1145. doi: 10.1037/a0037133

Table 2.

Fit Statistics for CFA Models

	χ²	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR	BIC	Δ df	Δ χ²	p
DSM-5 BL	577.60	164	.93	.92	.07	.04	26,922.69
DSM-5 Post	356.96	164	.95	.94	.07	.03	13,307.37
DSM-5 3-Mo	371.09	164	.94	.93	.07	.04	13,015.95
DSM-5 Equal Form	2,794.14	1584	.93	.92	.04	.04	52,252.41
DSM -5 Equal Factor Loadings	2,842.84	1616	.93	.92	.04	.04	52,088.51	32	44.58	.06
DSM -5 Equal Intercepts	2932.62	1648	.93	.92	.04	.05	51982.16	32	98.89	<.001

Note. CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; χ² = χ -squared; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; BIC = Bayesian information criteria; Δ df = difference in degrees of freedom; Δ χ² = difference in χ² using the Satorra-Bentler Scaled Chi-Square method; DSM-5 BL = CFA of DSM-5 model at baseline; DSM-5 Post = CFA of DSM-5 model at post intervention assessment; DSM-5 3-Mo = CFA of DSM-5 model at 3 month assessment.