Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Radiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):101–107. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000106

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative MIPs of from two volunteers, volunteer 1 on top and volunteer 2 on bottom, with three different settings: baseline (left), commercial dielectric padding (middle), and high-permittivity dielectric padding (right). Compared with baseline and commercial dielectric padding, high-permittivity dielectric padding significantly increased signal around the bifurcation point of the common femoral artery. MIPs displayed in identical grayscales per subject.