. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul 7;29(2):282–291. doi: 10.1037/neu0000113

Table 2.

Regression Models Predicting Global MCCB Performance (Experiment 1)

	β	F	R²
Step 1		7.96^***	.28
Constant
VSVT Difficult Accuracy	.36^***
SANS Total	−.27^**
PA	−.16
SA	.03
Step 2		10.71^***	.28
Constant
VSVT Difficult Accuracy	.36^***
SANS Total	−.26^**
PA	−.14
Step 3		14.79^***	.26
Constant
VSVT Difficult Accuracy	.39^***
SANS Total	−.30^**

Note.

^***

p < 0.001;

^**

p< 0.01;

MCCB = MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; VSVT = Victoria Symptom Validity Test; SANS = Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; PA = Chapman Scale Physical Anhedonia; SA = Chapman Scale Social Anhedonia