Table 2.
Regression Models Predicting Global MCCB Performance (Experiment 1)
| β | F | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 7.96*** | .28 | |
| Constant | |||
| VSVT Difficult Accuracy | .36*** | ||
| SANS Total | −.27** | ||
| PA | −.16 | ||
| SA | .03 | ||
| Step 2 | 10.71*** | .28 | |
| Constant | |||
| VSVT Difficult Accuracy | .36*** | ||
| SANS Total | −.26** | ||
| PA | −.14 | ||
| Step 3 | 14.79*** | .26 | |
| Constant | |||
| VSVT Difficult Accuracy | .39*** | ||
| SANS Total | −.30** |
Note.
p < 0.001;
p< 0.01;
MCCB = MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; VSVT = Victoria Symptom Validity Test; SANS = Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; PA = Chapman Scale Physical Anhedonia; SA = Chapman Scale Social Anhedonia