. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul 7;29(2):282–291. doi: 10.1037/neu0000113

Table 4.

Regression Models Predicting Global MCCB Performance (Experiment 2)

	β	F	R²
Step 1		4.26^**	.44
WMT	.36*
Success Expectancy	.07
BNSS Total	−.37*
SARA-Q	.04
PA	−.39
SA	.28
Step 2		5.25^***	.44
WMT	.35*
Success Expectancy	.08
BNSS Total	−.35*
PA	−.38
SA	.28
Step 3		6.60^***	.43
WMT	.38^**
BNSS Total	−.36*
PA	−.39*
SA	.29
Step 4		7.70^***	.39
WMT	.42^**
BNSS Total	−.29
PA	−.21
Step 5		10.36^***	.36
WMT	.47^***
BNSS Total	−.38^**

Note.

^***

p < 0.001;

^**

p< 0.01;

MCCB = MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; WMT = Word Memory Test; BNSS = Brief Negative Symptom Scale; SARA-Q = Success and Resource Appraisals Questionnaire; PA = Chapman Scale Physical Anhedonia; SA = Chapman Scale Social Anhedonia; Success Expectancy = How well participants expected to do on the Word Memory Test