Table 4.
Regression Models Predicting Global MCCB Performance (Experiment 2)
| β | F | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 4.26** | .44 | |
| WMT | .36* | ||
| Success Expectancy | .07 | ||
| BNSS Total | −.37* | ||
| SARA-Q | .04 | ||
| PA | −.39 | ||
| SA | .28 | ||
| Step 2 | 5.25*** | .44 | |
| WMT | .35* | ||
| Success Expectancy | .08 | ||
| BNSS Total | −.35* | ||
| PA | −.38 | ||
| SA | .28 | ||
| Step 3 | 6.60*** | .43 | |
| WMT | .38** | ||
| BNSS Total | −.36* | ||
| PA | −.39* | ||
| SA | .29 | ||
| Step 4 | 7.70*** | .39 | |
| WMT | .42** | ||
| BNSS Total | −.29 | ||
| PA | −.21 | ||
| Step 5 | 10.36*** | .36 | |
| WMT | .47*** | ||
| BNSS Total | −.38** | 
Note.
p < 0.001;
p< 0.01;
MCCB = MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; WMT = Word Memory Test; BNSS = Brief Negative Symptom Scale; SARA-Q = Success and Resource Appraisals Questionnaire; PA = Chapman Scale Physical Anhedonia; SA = Chapman Scale Social Anhedonia; Success Expectancy = How well participants expected to do on the Word Memory Test