Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2015 Feb;22(2):185–197. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000280

Table 5.

Linear Mixed-Effects Longitudinal Modela: Endometrial Thicknessb Response Across Time Points (N=208, compliant model)

Outcome Variable Independent Variable Parameter
Estimate
Standard
Error
pValuec

Endometrial
Thicknessb
Intercept −0.401 0.262 0.13
Site (ISU=0) 0.528 0.049 ≤0.0001
Treatment (80 mg) 0.032 0.056 0.57
Treatment (120 mg) 0.043 0.055 0.43
Time (mo) −0.008 0.001 ≤0.0001
Estrogen Exposured (y) 0.022 0.007 0.0013
Plasma 17-β Estradiol (pg/mL) 0.006 0.002 0.0086
Alcohol Intakee (g/week) −0.001 0.0004 0.023
Serum Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (µIU/L) −0.020 0.011 0.066
a

Overall model vs model with obligatory design variables only: likelihood ratio = 12.149; df=4; p≤0.0001. Likelihood ratio based on maximum likelihood estimation; estimates and significances based on restricted maximum likelihood estimation.

b

Natural logarithm of endometrial thickness as variance stabilizing transformation.

c

P values are based on asymptotic normality of t-distribution; variables left in model were significant at p≤0.10 level (acceptable Type I error rate in modeling endometrial thickness). Additional variables (i.e., body weight, lactation duration, etc.) did not remain in model. The interaction between treatment and time (log likelihood ratio=3.996; df=2) was not significant (p=0.14).

d

Calculated at baseline, estrogen exposure in years = age at menopause – age at menarche; estrogen exposure was not related to plasma 17-β estradiol (Pearson correlation coefficient = −0.05).

e

Represents usual weekly alcohol intake at baseline, which was assessed at baseline from a dietary questionnaire.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure