Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 25;88(1):103–112. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0941-x

Table 1.

Correlations and descriptive statistics

M(SD) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Age 47.40 (10.05)
2. Gender (female) .53 (–) .01
3. University education .37 (–) −.05* .13*
4. Having children .52 (–) −.30* −.02 .05*
5. Work–family conflict T1 2.13 (1.04) −.10* .05* .15* .10*
6. Emotional exhaustion T1 1.63 (1.47) .00 .12* .03 −.01 .49* .87
7. Performance-based self-esteem T1 3.59 (1.44) −.09* .05* .10* .01 .32* .32* .85
8. Work–family conflict T2 2.11 (1.05) −.13* .06* .17* .12* .54* .34* .27*
9. Emotional exhaustion T2 1.71 (1.46) −.02 .13* .04* −.01 .37* .67* .26* .47* .87
10. Performance-based self-esteem T2 3.31 (1.40) −.11* .06* .13* .04* .30* .28* .66* .31* .28* .87

Listwise; n = 3,387. * p < .05; – not applicable. The scales ranged from 1 to 5 except gender (men = 0 and women = 1), age (in years), university education (which was coded 1 = university education, 0 = lower levels of education) and having children living at home (0 = no. 1 = yes). In the diagonal in italic: Cronbach’s alpha