Table 2.
Drug | Alemtuzumab 12 mg |
Natalizumab 300 mg |
Fingolimod 0.5 mg |
Dimethyl fumarate 240 mg (twice daily) |
Teriflunomide 14 mg |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | CARE-MS I [Cohen et al. 2012] n = 581 | CARE-MS II [Coles et al. 2012b] n = 667 | AFFIRM [Polman et al. 2006] n = 942 | FREEDOMS [Kappos et al. 2010] n = 1272 | TRANSFORMS [Cohen et al. 2010] n = 1292 | CONFIRM [Fox et al. 2012] n = 1430 | DEFINE [Gold et al. 2012] n = 1237 | TEMSO [O’Connor et al. 2011] n = 1088 | TOWER [Confavreux et al. 2014] n = 1169 | TENERE [Vermersch et al. 2013] n = 324 |
Comparator | SC IFNB-1a | SC IFNB-1a | Placebo | Placebo | IFNB-1a IM | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | SC IFNB-1a |
ARR, relative reduction versus comparator | 55% p < 0.0001 | 49% p < 0.0001 | 68% p < 0.001 | 54% p < 0.001 | 38% p < 0.001 | 44% p < 0.001 | 53% p < 0.001 | 32% p < 0.001 | 36% p = 0.0001 | None |
HR of 3-month confirmed disability versus comparator (95% CI) | NA | 0.72 p = 0.08 | 0.58 (0.43−0.77) p < 0.001 | 0.70 (0.52−0.96) p = 0.02 | No significant difference in time to disability progression or proportion of patients with confirmed progression | 0.79 (0.52−1.19) p = 0.25 | 0.62 (0.44−0.87) p = 0.005 | 0.70 (0.51−0.97) | 0.68 (0.4−1.00) p = 0.0442 | NA |
HR of 6-month confirmed disability versus comparator (95% CI) | 0.70 (0.40−1.23) p = 0.22 | 0.58 (0.38−0.87) p = 0.0084 | 0.46 (0.33−0.64) p < 0.001 | 0.63 (0.44−0.90) p = 0.01 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
ARR, annualized relapse rate; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IFNB-1a, interferon beta-1a; IM, intramuscular; NA, not available; SC, subcutaneous.