Table 4.

Comparison between the durum consensus interpolated map and the hexaploid consensus maps

	Durum consensus interpolated map
	Common markers			Collinearity
	Framework	Non framework	Total	Spearman rank correlation	Regression
Chromosomes	(no.)	(no.)	(no.)	( ρ )	(R 2 )
Ta-SSR-2004 (1)
1A	11	11	22	0.956	0.896
1B	16	14	30	0.930	0.950
2A	13	27	28	0.979	0.950
2B	15	27	42	0.983	0.935
3A	11	15	26	0.921	0.889
3B	15	26	41	0.967	0.975
4A	6	16	22	0.939	0.950
4B	12	13	25	0.963	0.900
5A	17	26	43	0.956	0.938
5B	12	17	29	0.982	0.977
6A	12	7	19	0.931	0.880
6B	12	20	32	0.940	0.921
7A	10	20	30	0.979	0.934
7B	21	14	35	0.957	0.981
Mean	21	18	30	0.956	0.934
Chr. 3B consensus map (2)
3B	21	45	66	0.981	0.961

⁽¹⁾ Ta-SSR-2004 reported in Somers et al. (2004); [16].

⁽²⁾ Chr. 3B consensus map reported in Paux et al. 2008; [37].