Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 – Violence exposure (W1 & W2) | -- | −.13* | .20** | .03 | .15* | −.23*** | −.28*** | −.04 |
2 – Support and acceptance (W1 & W2) | -- | −.24*** | −.14* | −.20** | .04 | 0 | .06 | |
3 – Callous-Unemotional traitsb (W3) | -- | .13+ | −.12+ | −.10 | −.12+ | −.13+ | ||
4 – Child sex | -- | −.03 | .03 | .05 | −.06 | |||
5 – Child age | -- | −.08 | 0 | .01 | ||||
6 – Maternal education | -- | .30*** | .18** | |||||
7 – Household income | -- | .41*** | ||||||
8 – Family structure | -- | |||||||
Mean | −.20 | .07 | .70 | 43% male | 13.00 | Mdn high school | Mdn $401–500/wk | 32% two-parent |
SD | 3.16 | 3.20 | .28 | 1.56 |
Note. N = 234.
Variable was log transformed due to skewness. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2; W3 = Wave 3. Sex was coded 0 = female, 1 = male. Family structure was coded 0 = single-parent family, 1 = two-parent family.
p < .10;
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001.