Table 1.
Items Related to Satisfaction with Ease of Use and Perceived Clinical Benefit of PainTracker
| % Respondents Satisfied (Strongly Agree, Agree) | % Respondents Dissatisfied (Strongly Disagree, Disagree) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall, I am satisfied with PainTracker | 56.6 (13.3, 43.3) | 8 (3.3, 23.3) |
| Overall, I find PainTracker easy to use | 70 (10, 60) | 26.6 (3.3, 23.3) |
| It is easy to visualize change in pain outcomes that correspond to changes in pain treatments by viewing PainTracker in the electronic record | 39.9 (3.3, 36.6) | 46.6 (6.6, 40) |
| PainTracker is missing important pain outcomesa | 20a (0, 20) | 36.6a (3.3, 33.3) |
| I think PainTracker helps patients participate in their pain management | 76.6 (16.6, 50) | 3.3 (3.3, 0) |
| PainTracker helps me to modify a pain treatment plan according to treatment response | 39.9 (6.6, 33.3) | 30 (0, 30) |
| Using PainTracker during the patient visit improves my efficiency in understanding how my patients are doing | 53.3 (13.3, 40) | 36.6 (3.3, 33.3) |
| PainTracker improves the safety of the care I provide | 30 (10, 20) | 63.2 (6.6, 56.6) |
a
Item is negatively phrased; disagreement actually implies agreement.