Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 5;6(10):1231–1245. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201403848

Table 1.

Morphologic features and hemodynamic analysis of CaMKII DKO and FFFF mice, 5 weeks after I/R surgery

FFFF
DKO
Sham I/R Sham I/R
Heart weight (mg) 125.0 ± 16.0 127.0 ± 12.5 144.0 ± 22.4 139.7 ± 13.8
Body weight (g) 27.2 ± 2.1 26.7 ± 2.1 27.5 ± 2.9 26.0 ± 2.9
HW/BW ratio (mg/g) 4.6 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 1.4 5.2 ± 0.4 5.2 ± 0.4
Heart rate (bpm) 358.4 ± 29.5 360.0 ± 34.5 401.4 ± 30.2 390.3 ± 40.1
Ejection fraction (%) 60.6 ± 4.4 44.1 ± 10.9 61.3 ± 11.4 53.5 ± 10.6
dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) 5,514 ± 1300 4,477 ± 1993 6,065 ± 989 5,702 ± 1661
dV/dtmax (μL/s) 1,360 ± 546 1,295 ± 486 1,536 ± 498 1,445 ± 531
LVESP (mmHg) 103.3 ± 13.2 83.6 ± 12.0 105.0 ± 14.8 93.6 ± 9.2
LVEDP (mmHg) 3.6 ± 1.3 3.6 ± 1.9 2.8 ± 0.9 3.3 ± 1.2
SV (μL) 25.1 ± 4.4 20.1 ± 5.8* 25.8 ± 5.5 24.7 ± 9.2
Tau (ms) 11.6 ± 2.2 12.1 ± 2.0 9.8 ± 1.1 11.6 ± 3.0

HW/BW, heart weight/body weight ratio; LVESP, LV end-systolic pressure; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure; SV, stroke volume; Tau, time constant of pressure relaxation.

CaMKII DKO and FFFF mice were subjected to hemodynamic detection 5 weeks after I/R surgery. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of values from nine mice in sham groups and 13 mice in I/R groups.

*

< 0.05.

< 0.01 versus sham FFFF.

< 0.05 versus I/R FFFF.