Table 2.
Sensitivity Analysis for the Effect of a Spouse’s Smoking Cessation Status on an Ego’s Smoking Cessation: Corrected Contagion Effect Estimate Under Latent Homophily for Smoking Cessation: Percent Increase (95% CI)
| Prevalence of U | Effect of latent factor U on Smoking Cessation (γ) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 4 | |
| π1 =0.6, π0=0.4 | 61 (53,67) | 54 (47,60) | 49 (42,54) | 46 (39,51) | 41 (34,46) | 37 (30,42) | 31 (25,36) |
| π1 =0.65, π0=0.35 | 58 (51,64) | 48 (41,53) | 41 (34,46) | 37 (30,42) | 29 (23,34) | 23 (18,28) | 16 (10,20) |
| π1 =0.7, π0=0.3 | 55 (48,61) | 42 (35,47) | 32 (26,38) | 28 (22,32) | 18 (12,22) | 11 (5,15) | 2 (−2,6) |
| π1 =0.7, π0=0.25 | 54 (46,59) | 39 (33,44) | 28 (22,33) | 23 (17,27) | 12 (6,16) | 4 (−1,8) | −6 (−10,−2) |
| π1 =0.75, π0=0.25 | 52 (45,58) | 37 (30,42) | 25 (19,30) | 19 (13,23) | 8 (2,12) | 0 (−5,4) | −10 (−14,−7) |
| π1 =0.8, π0=0.25 | 51 (44,57) | 34 (28,39) | 22 (16,27) | 16 (10,20) | 4 (−1,8) | −4 (−8,0) | −14 (−18,−10) |
| π1 =0.8 π0=0.2 | 50 (43,55) | 31 (25,36) | 18 (12,22) | 11 (5,15) | −1 (−6,2) | −10 (−14,−6) | −21 (−25,−19) |
Settings with π1 < π0 all result with percent increase and 95% CI large than the observed estimate of 67 (59, 73)