Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;5:7659. doi: 10.1038/srep07659

Table 1. Anode performance comparison of recent works about relevant Si/C structure.

Structure Method Si mass percent Rct @ cycles [Ω] Current density [A g−1] Capacity @ cycles [mA h g−1] Capacity retention
Hollow CNS/Si/Al2O3 (Ours) PECVD 62.5% 51 @ 0 1 1560 @ 100 84.8%
      60 @ 100      
Si@void@Carbon tubes25 Electrospinning 47% - 1 870 @ 200 90%
Si@void@C26 Chemical Etching 71% ~1000 @ 0 4.2 1300 @ 1000 74%
      ~150 @ 10      
Si@void@C27 Chemical Etching 48% - 0.2 1625 @ 100a) 69%
Si@void@C28 Electroless Etching 63% - 0.2 1500 @ 50 79%
SiNW@void@ graphitic tubes29 CVD 70% - 4.2 1100 @ 1000 63%
Si@Graphene30 Electrostatic Attraction 80.1% 28 @ 0 0.1 1205 @ 150 73%
      75 @ 150      
Si/B4C/Graphite31 Ball Milling 57% 100 @ 1 0.63 680 @ 200 78.5%
Aligned CNT/Si sheet32 CVD 60–70% - 0.1 1494 @ 45 94%
Rolled-Up C/Si/C33 Sputtering 40% - 0.5 1000 @ 300 1
Twisted MWCNT/Si fiber34 E-beam Evaporation 38.1% 185 @ 0 1 1000 @ 50 61%
      68 @ 30      
Si/AlGL35 Molecular Layer Deposition 1 140 @ 0 0.1 Cb) 900 @ 150 55%

a)Capacity was calculated based on Si mass;

b)C rate was not mentioned in the reference.