Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 4;197(1):174–187. doi: 10.1128/JB.02244-14

TABLE 2.

COMSTAT analysis of PAO1, PAO1 ΔgcbA, PAO1/pJN105, and PAO1/pJN-gcbA biofilmsa

Strain Total biomass (μm3/μm2) Substratum coverage (%) Avg thickness (μm) Roughness coefficient Maximum thickness (μm)
PAO1 7.27 (±1.85) 22.27 (±6.90) 7.61 (±2.15) 1.41 (±0.15) 42.13 (±8.93)
PAO1 ΔgcbA 9.28 (±3.17) 40.88 (±16.36)* 9.82 (±3.46) 1.02 (±0.24) 45.33 (±9.19)
PAO1/pJN105 6.16 (±2.85) 14.08 (±4.15) 6.22 (±3.04) 1.68 (±0.09) 48.43 (±9.30)
PAO1/pJN-gcbA 3.78 (±3.29)* 8.18 (±5.84)* 3.95 (±3.59)* 1.81 (±0.14) 45.43 (±14.24)
a

COMSTAT analysis was carried out on 144-h-old biofilms grown in triplicate, using at least 6 images per replicate. Values are means (±standard deviation). *, significantly different from the results for wild-type biofilms (P ≤ 0.01).