Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan;36(Suppl 1):S81–S90. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.035

Table 5.

Estimated sample sizes (95% CI) per arm (80% power at the 5% significance level to detect 25% reduction in disease progression) with and without controlling for normal aging using the STEPS-KN-BSI, pBSI1, pBSIγ, and gBSI taking into account the hippocampal atrophy rates

STEPS-KN-BSI pBSI1 pBSIγ gBSI
1.5 T
 Based on AD atrophy rates alone (N = 133) 109 (81–150) 147 (106–209) 281 (186–458) 106 (78–146)
 Controlling for normal aging (N = 328) 184 (127–271) 253 (165–412) 495 (285–1002) 177 (121–271)
3T
 Based on AD atrophy rates alone (N = 24) 212 (83–700) 217 (83–769) 457 (153–3265) 222 (82–840)
 Controlling for normal aging (N = 63) 265 (92–1320) 276 (96–1310) 590 (168–9900) 250 (83–1329)
Comparison Percentage difference of sample size (95% CI)
1.5 T 3T
STEPS-KN-BSI versus gBSI
 AD rates alone −2.7 (−13.4 to 9.7), >0.05 4.8 (−20.9 to 31.8), >0.05
 Controlling for aging −4.18 (−16.3 to 10.2), >0.05 −5.8 (−31.7 to 26.2), >0.05
pBSI1 versus gBSI
 AD rates alone −27.8 (−36.5 to −19.4), <0.05 2.4 (−23.9 to 34.5), >0.05
 Controlling for aging −30.1 (−40.6 to −20.2), <0.05 −9.4 (−36.4 to 25.8), >0.05
pBSIγ versus gBSI
 AD rates alone −62.0 (−72.7 to −51.7), <0.05 −51.3 (−76.3 to −20.3), <0.05
 Controlling for aging −64.2 (−76.8 to −51.1), <0.05 −57.7 (−86.5 to −22.6), <0.05

Key: AD, Alzheimer's disease; CI, confidence interval; gBSI, generalized boundary shift integral.