Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 16;83(1):286–291. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02360-14

TABLE 3.

Survival of piglets orally challenged with 1010 CFU of STEC 86-24 followed by intramuscular administration of either a placebo or an Stx2-neutralizing VNA treatment 24 h or 48 h later

Treatment (h post-STEC challenge) Dose (vp/kg) No. of piglets No. of surviving piglets (% survival)a Mean time (days) to death/euthanasia (± SD)b Mean serum VNA concn (μg/ml) (range)c
Placebod (24) 1 × 1011 or 1 × 1012 6 0 (0) 3.50 (±0.54) A Not relevante
Ad/VNA-Stx (24) 1 × 1012 4 3 (75) 5.0 BC 0.70 (0.2–2.0)
1 × 1011 6 6 (100) 9.0 (±0.0) BC 0.08 (0.03–1.0)
Ad/VNA-Stx (48) 1 × 1012 7 4 (57) 3.33 (±0.57) AC 0.23 (0.05–0.4)
1 × 1011 2 1 (50) 3.0 AC 0.15
a

Piglets that did not survive either died overnight or were euthanized due to severe illness.

b

Surviving piglets in the Ad/VNA-Stx groups were euthanized after 9 days. The survival times of piglets that either were euthanized or died in Ad/VNA-Stx groups are shown. Survival times followed by the same capital letter are not statistically significantly different. Different capital letters following survival times indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

c

Estimated concentration of VNA in piglet serum at the time of euthanasia.

d

Four piglets in the placebo group received 1012 vp of Ad/VNA-BoNTA/kg, and two received 1011 vp of Ad/VNA-Tcd/kg.

e

The estimated mean VNA concentration in the sera of pigs receiving 1012 vp of Ad/VNA-BoNTA/kg was 3.75 μg/ml, and that for pigs receiving 1011 vp of Ad/VNA-Tcd/kg was 0.02 μg/ml.