Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 23;10:CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub3

Comparison 1. Electronic device (various types of CCTV) versus optical device.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Reading speed (words per minute) 3 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
 1.1 Stand-mounted CCTV versus best prescribed optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.2 Stand-mounted CCTV versus participant's optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.3 Mouse-based device (27” TV monitor) versus best prescribed optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.4 Mouse-based device (14” monitor) versus participant's optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.5 Mouse-based head-mounted device versus participant's optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.6 Flipperport head-mounted CCTV (table stand camera) versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.7 Jordy head-mounted CCTV versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.8 Maxport head-mounted CCTV versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 1.9 NuVision head-mounted CCTV versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Reading duration in minutes 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
 2.1 Stand CCTV versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 2.2 Hand-held CCTV versus optical device 1 Mean difference (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]