Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 3;275(6):631–639. doi: 10.1111/joim.12177

Table 3.

Associations between lifestyle factors and CHD risk adjusted for age and cohort

Lifestyle factor Sex Cox regression correcting for relatedness Stratified Cox regression in MZ pairs Stratified Cox regression in DZ pairs Zygosity–lifestyle interaction
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value P value
Smoking Men 1.27 (1.19, 1.36) <0.001 1.16 (0.86, 1.57) 0.323 1.18 (0.99, 1.41) 0.066 0.930
Women 1.37 (1.26, 1.50) <0.001 1.77 (1.23, 2.53) 0.002 1.61 (1.27, 2.05) <0.001 0.683
Sedentary lifestyle Men 1.09 (0.98, 1.22) 0.099 1.48 (1.01, 2.17) 0.046 0.94 (0.73, 1.20) 0.609 0.051
Women 1.14 (1.01, 1.28) 0.033 1.36 (0.92, 1.99) 0.122 1.140.84, 1.55 0.395 0.491
Alcohol consumption Men 0.99 (0.91, 1.08) 0.842 0.95 (0.67, 1.35) 0.772 0.95 (0.76, 1.19) 0.654 0.997
Women 0.89 (0.74, 1.08) 0.248 0.74 (0.36, 1.51) 0.410 1.49 (0.93, 2.37) 0.094 0.108
BMI Men 1.20 (1.15, 1.24) <0.001 1.26 (1.05, 1.50) 0.011 1.15 (1.03, 1.27) 0.01 0.372
Women 1.20 (1.15, 1.26) <0.001 1.21 (0.93, 1.57) 0.155 1.08 (0.95, 1.22) 0.227 0.437

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MZ, monozygotic; DZ, dizygotic; BMI, body mass index.

Zygosity was classified as MZ = 1, DZ = 2 in the zygosity–lifestyle interaction term.