Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 9;10(1):e0116415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116415

Table 3. Model selection tables examining the effect of age and breeding experience on characteristics of wandering albatross foraging trips, breeding birds tracked between 1991 and 2012.

∆AIC compared to best model

Trip duration
Max dist from col
Bearing
Inflection latitude
Inflection longitude
Sample size 207 207 207 207 207
Age * Sex + Year + Stage 0.51 3.12 2.01 1.51 4.62
Age * Sex + Year 45.64 18.74 10.26 17.53 32.19
Age * Sex + Stage 14.40 2.72 15.57 3.67 0.47
Age * Sex 100.29 48.84 31.51 41.13 60.33
Age + Sex + Year + Stage 0.99 2.24 2.20 0.00 5.07
Age + Sex + Stage 12.48 1.86 16.60 1.94 0.84
Age + Sex + Year 44.72 17.73 11.22 16.81 32.03
Age + Stage + Year 5.42 5.15 0.38 12.60 3.64
Sex + Stage + Year 0.00 0.32 1.75 0.72 4.63
Year + Stage 4.58 3.28 0.00 13.50 3.14
Sex + Stage 13.72 0.00 15.39 4.27 1.00
Sex + Year 43.02 15.73 10.24 15.54 30.62
Age + Stage 14.84 3.97 14.64 11.30 0.00
Age + Year 49.51 21.17 9.26 26.79 31.28
Age + Sex 97.15 47.47 30.62 39.14 58.75
Age 101.12 50.73 28.84 47.49 58.20
Sex 101.04 46.69 29.39 38.16 66.38
Year 47.91 19.19 8.30 25.70 29.80
Stage 16.66 2.19 13.41 14.28 0.02
Null 106.02 50.97 27.58 46.65 66.52

The best model in each case is highlighted in italics (where ∆AIC = 0). The most parsimonious model in each case is highlighted in bold (where ∆AIC<2 compared to the best model).