Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jan;26(1):71–75. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001233

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Surgeons’ ratings of cleft severity and anticipated surgical outcomes among bilateral cleft lip and palate patients by nasoalveolar molding preparation group. Estimates and 95% confidence intervals generated from cross-classified multilevel models. Note: All differences between nasoalveolar molding-prepared patient and non-nasoalveolar molding-prepared patient groups are significant (p < 0.001); NAM = nasoalveolar molding.